dil [he/him, comrade/them]

  • 0 Posts
  • 7 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 17th, 2025

help-circle
  • Looks like he's focusing mostly on the financial impact to the folks who's work gets used as training data

    The judge repeatedly appeared to be sympathetic to authors, suggesting that Meta’s AI training may be a “highly unusual case” where even though “the copying is for a highly transformative purpose, the copying has the high likelihood of leading to the flooding of the markets for the copyrighted works.”

    And when Shanmugam argued that copyright law doesn’t shield authors from “protection from competition in the marketplace of ideas,” Chhabria resisted the framing that authors weren’t potentially being robbed, Reuters reported.

    “But if I’m going to steal things from the marketplace of ideas in order to develop my own ideas, that’s copyright infringement, right?” Chhabria responded.

    Wired noted that he asked Meta’s lawyers, “What about the next Taylor Swift?” If AI made it easy to knock off a young singer’s sound, how could she ever compete if AI produced “a billion pop songs” in her style?


  • This is super interesting! Good article too - I feel like I understand the general ideas behind the experiments they ran.

    The findings align pretty well with the observations we’ve seen with MDMA being effective treatment for PTSD.

    Also kinda reminds me of how both humans and monkeys laugh when we think there’s something scary, then find out it’s not a threat. This study is on a longer time scale (across days, not a single moment), but a flood of dopamine to extinguish fear makes sense.

    Hopefully follow-up studies will be done to look into what causes each region of the brain to sensitize to dopamine.



  • I’m not saying “yay, it’s morally good to send bomb threats.”

    Folks who care about privacy don’t want their email provider engaging with local authorities.

    when tyranny becomes law rebellion becomes duty

    “Illegal” is NOT immoral, and when laws are increasingly being passed by right-wing nutjobs, folks doing the right thing will be doing illegal things.

    • women getting access to an abortion
    • undocumented folks avoiding being sent to El Salvador
    • trans folks getting healthcare

    Any platform has three options:

    1. Always comply with law enforcement, and give up vulnerable populations that are targeted by the government
    2. Never comply with law enforcement, and make law enforcement track down bomb threats some other way
    3. Sometimes comply with law enforcement, based on… what criteria? where’s the line?

    3 is obviously the thing we’d like, but no company is going to open itself up to legal threats by doing it.

    This article shows that Proton Mail is falling into category 2. I think that category should exist to protect vulnerable populations.



  • its employees had received emails containing obscene and vulgar content sent via Proton Mail.

    the email service reportedly refused to share details about the sender of the allegedly offensive emails, despite a police complaint.

    Last year, the police department of the southern state of Tamil Nadu had sought to block Proton Mail after the email service was found to have been used for sending hoax bomb threats to local schools.

    Honestly, pretty glowing review of Proton Mail