• 2 Posts
  • 61 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle








  • We don’t. The point is to reduce attack surface relative to target value. People use a VPN for piracy, for example, not because it’s totally secure, but because rights holders generally aren’t going to bother going after a single person when they’d have to go thru a VPN provider as well. OTOH someone doing it on clearnet is being logged by their ISP and the data is right there. OTOOH, the three letter agencies are absolutely going to bother if they have a tip that you’re doing something really dangerous to the status quo.

    TL;DR: It’s like IRL security. If somebody really wants your shit, they’ll find a way to get it. The point is to make it generally not worth it.



  • It’s worth noting that Ad Standards is the industry self-regulatory body. They don’t do anything pro-actively, and nothing they do is legally enforceable. They don’t have the power to issue fines or enforce takedowns and all their recommendations are just that – recommendations. Member organisations tend to abide by the industry rules, but they themselves had a hand in writing those rules. All that really amounts to is the occasional withdrawal of an ad -after- it’s been running long enough to have complaints received and reviewed. In the meantime, the damage is frequently already done. More frequently it’s a case of “we have investigated ourselves and found we’ve done nothing wrong” (note the number of “no breach” decisions in the article). Non-members, OTOH, are under no obligation to do anything at all (the Gotham City ad in the article is still running AFAIK, despite being declared a breach – Gotham City are not a member of Ad Standards). All it really does is acts as a way for people to feel like their complaints are being heard while fundamentally changing nothing.