ProtonMail does have offline access by way of the Bridge, but it is an extra program you have to run.

This is why I’ve used Emby for the longest time.

Right so it was outsourced to Indians. Thats old news.

The information you provided did not prove what he said at all. Why are you lying about it?

Rhetorical of course, you’re a misinformation bot.

I’m still waiting on you to share your articles of proof, which obviously do not exist. If you’re not going to post them, then all that’s been proven is that you’re a misinformation bot who can’t back up his accusations. If you manage to post something, we can scrutinize it and I can explain to you why it’s misinformation. But you’d have to post them.

It’s not my job to find the nonexistent articles you’re talking about for you. The burden of proof is entirely on you here.

You were trying to help out that other misinformation bot find the made up event he was talking about and you couldn’t. I downvoted it because that’s what you’re supposed to do with unhelpful information.

You claimed multiple articles are proof of Protons wrongdoing and seem to be unable to provide a single one. If you can’t back up your accusations then that makes you the misinformation agent I’m afraid.

It’s not my responsibility to go find these ambiguous and unidentified articles you’re referencing for you. If I tried you’d just say “Oh that’s not one of the ones I meant”. If they are as abundant as you claim, you’d have no trouble finding a couple. So we can scrutinize them properly.

Yeah B&N is still expanding AFAIK

You claimed there is article after article of proof. Go ahead and share it with us. You can’t just uno-reverse the burden of proof for your claim to me lol.

There is plenty of misinformation in this thread alone. Like this comment here

Which consists of a completely fabricated story about Proton with no evidence that it happened, and some anecdote the OP heard from somebody else with no verification whatsoever.

I might not have an entirely right but that’s generally what they did, they took the word off governments over people

No they didn’t. Thats not “generally” what they did at all. You’re just spreading more misinformation that you admittedly aren’t even very confident about.

Second of all I happen to know they accept blacklists as trustworthy, I know because someone who isn’t me is on one and they refused them an account.

Do you have any proof of this? Or are you just going with “I heard from a guy”?

Ironic you made misinformation to claim this. It’s a strawman. Anyway

I didn’t make any misinformation. Nor is there a strawman. If you think there is “article after article” of proof then feel free to provide a couple.

No, it’s their false advertisement that claims it is within their control.

Like what exactly?

They’re not at all above criticism. The thing is all we have in the way of criticism is article after article of misinformation born from either technical ignorance or deliberate misrepresentation of the facts. None of which stand up to a moments scrutiny, much less “prove” anything.

On the more innocent side of the scale, you’ll have people chastising Proton over negatives that are entirely out of their control, and exist because they have to when operating as a public email provider. Then those same people will point people to alternatives like Fastmail or Tutanota that have all the same problems, but are less transparent about it.

Like if you want to make an argument against public email providers as a whole you can surely do so, but so far there’s really no evidence that Proton is anything but as good as you are reasonably going to get if you do decide to use one.

Because proton not only accepts people on blacklists as deserving to be there with no way to appeal, despite you know, things

You’re going to have to elaborate or rephrase this because I have no idea what you’re trying to say here

they also removed like thousands of people that the US government said they were suspicious of they sent them a list and they suspended all their email accounts, no appeal nothing. Based on the word of the United States government, a famously untrustworthy source. I say that as United States citizen.

No they didn’t.

No, it isn’t.

The M9 was when phones absolutely peaked. It’s all been downhill since then.

Easy there Pickle Rick you might cut yourself on that edge lol

Big cities that still have live DJs mostly.

Many Pizza Huts do hire their own drivers.

• AI is not profitable and has no obvious path as of right now ow to become profitable.
• The adoption we’ve seen from so many companies is based solely on the fact that AI is cheaper than salaries. But AI companies are currently running at a huge loss, and the price gauging is inevitable. AI will likely never be as economically viable for the average company in the future as it is right now.
• The future of AI very much depends on it continuing to improve for the next decade at the same rate that it’s improved in the last 5 years. This doesn’t seem super likely given the fact that we got here by training AI on more and more data created by humans, and now that so much publicly accessible content is written by AI, it will be harder and harder to find new training data to improve AI in any meaningful way.

There are just so many big questions out there surrounding AI and it’s masters and biggest cheerleaders don’t have straight answers for them.

Big tech are the ones behind the age verification push. Linux wouldn’t become illegal, only the distros available to end users would be.