

Yeah, it’s pretty dire. Those aformentioned countries are the only places in which to go where learning a new language isn’t necessary to get permanent citizenship.
To get permanent citizenship in any other country generally requires fluency in the native local language in pretty much all cases.
If I wanted to move to the EU, say the Netherlands for example, I wouldn’t be able to get EU/Dutch citizenship until learning and becoming fluent with the Dutch language, plus x amount of years with residence in the 1 specific EU country. Replace the language/country with whatever EU country and it’s the same situation.
Even with Canada, since I didn’t take French in middle or high school, that means Quebec is pretty much off the table for me, unless I go through the hassle of learning French as an adult.
Even if Canada could have a threat of invasion from the south, I do not think it would likely succeed, as there are at least 5 border states that are blue/democrat, and Canada would likely get help from other countries. Perhaps Mexico may start a second front from the south siding with Canada, so that there’s 2 fronts to deal with? Canada does have the city of Edmonton located pretty far from the US border, so it is not required to live adjacent to the US border in Canada. I would say that fleeing to Canada is about the same risk as fleeing to Finland or Estonia, and the latter two are in the EU.
Are there any other “at risk groups” that may likely be targeted but are not commonly talked about or targeted at the moment? I know trans, non male/female, green card residents, and naturalized citizens are some of the most at risk groups.
Cheeto has blamed aspergers/autism on vaccinations (?), so I’m not too sure yet whether cheeto plans to go after disabled/neurodiverse/aspergers people next. I have already seen “disabilities” and “disability” on the “banned words” list in the New York Times article about “banned words” at agencies in Washington.
I suspect that if the PRC goes after Taiwan, then that may put any ethnic Chinese in the U.S. into an at risk group.
The problem is that I’m not sure the latter I mentioned qualify for political asylum just yet, aside from the former that are targeted at the moment.
Which at risk groups should plan to leave right now aside from the most obvious?