Catholics are obligated to not eat “meat” on Ash Wednesday and Fridays during Lent. However, when used by Catholics, the term “meat” doesn’t encompass fish. I remember being taught this, and I asked my grandmother, “But isn’t fish a form of meat?” She then showed me a page from an explicitly Catholic glossary that defined “meat” as flesh that comes from land animals specifically, so it didn’t include seafood at all. It’s silly as hell to me that an animal living underwater somehow negates the “meat” property from its flesh when you consume it.
[CW: Mentions of Homophobia/Misogyny/FGM]
Whenever I ask carnists this question, I actually get tons of them saying “Eating dogs and cats is moral in places where it’s culturally acceptable, but where I’m from, it’s wrong because they’re pets and not food.”
To this, I always respond by saying “Okay, so in countries where homophobic violence is unfortunately a norm, is it socially acceptable? What about female genital mutilation? What about treating women as second-class citizens?” and despite me literally just taking their logic to its conclusion, I get some baseless “That’s different tho!” as a response.
smh my head