Do you think I’m calling you deranged in the first comment? Honestly? That’s your take from what I’ve written?

On the off chance that you’re serious, let me explain it to you.

1. If someone reads about cah doing something, and they are like “well I guess that’s normal now” they are deranged.

2. You can’t account for deranged people.

3. We should not take into account what these people think.

For all non deranged people this draws attention to and de-normalises the practice. I’m not the first person in your own replies explaining this to you.

Neither of these are claims about what you said? The second one isn’t even a claim? I was and am genuinely confused as to what you’re trying to say?

“You keep claiming I said things I never said”

That’s… literally not something I did. You’re literally claiming I said things I didn’t by saying I claim you said things you didn’t. I never claimed anything about what you said.

So are you saying cah can’t do this because it may be misinterpreted by utterly deranged people? Should we just give up then? Anything can be misinterpreted if the interpreter is deranged enough.

Also, I don’t know what you mean with “a rising elevator hasn’t already risen” but such an elevator would experience infinite jolt and would thus be physically impossible, except maybe if the elevator was a photon or something.

“It’s normal because cards against humanity did it”

Statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged

It’s not quite strictly worse; some older games are easier to run in wine than natively. But your point still stands.

No we have a better plan