• DancingBear@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Most people are not very much political or interested in politics in general.

      Most people do however support actual leftist and progressive policies.

      If any president just looked at polling and supported the implementation of policies that more than 60 percent of Americans support, or even only the issues with 70% approval (from both dems and republicans). That policians agenda would be a progressive, leftist agenda.

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I actually agree with you. However, the right wing won, full stop unfortunately.

        Arguing “no true leftist” or “Your side” is pointless. The Right won and no amount of semantics or told you so is going to change the results.

        So when they start mass deporting or rounding up trans people we can just say “the dems didn’t run progressive enough policie for me” and wash our hands of it I guess.

        • DancingBear@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Trump won every swing state. He lost my state and all of my states electoral college delegates are going to Harris. I could have voted for Mickey Mouse and this fact would not be different.

          Other voters in swing states had real issues with the economy, crime, and less so the genocide in Israel.

          Kamala unfortunately pivoted to the right and embraced republicans and corporate CEO’s. Why vote for republican light (Kamala) when you can just vote republican (Trump)? I assume this is what people were thinking.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 minutes ago

            Other voters in swing states had real issues with the economy, crime

            In other words, they were lied to and bought it hook, line, and sinker.

            • DancingBear@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 minutes ago

              These voters had issues and concerns.

              Trump addressed them.

              Kamala and the DNC shamed them and only said it would be worse under Trump.

              Voters are worried about the economy. It was the number one issue, especially in swing states.

              Trump had a news conference and talked about how expensive beans are.

              Kamala had a news conference where she talked about how the economy was already better, while embracing Dick Cheney and 80 corporate CEOs.

          • nomous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I assume this is what people were thinking.

            I’m not sure those people exist. Lemmy seems to think they do but the electorate doesn’t reflect that at all and unless they’re ready to arm themselves and fight (and they’re not, as much as they like to talk about it online) they may as well not exist.

            • DancingBear@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Not sure what you are responding to. Your response is kind of vague. Voters are saying they voted on the economy and immigration among other issues. Trump was speaking to these issues while Kamala was not.

              • nomous@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Other voters in swing states had real issues with

                I’m not sure those voters exist. Lemmy thinks that they do but i don’t see any evidence that they’re real people.

                At any rate there’s little difference between not-voting and not-existing in the grand scheme so now we get to see what happens when an unashamed fascist wins and surrounds himself with yes men.

                Unless those principled non-voters are ready to arm themselves and actually agitate, they might as well not exist and we can proceed accordingly.

                • DancingBear@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  I still don’t understand your point.

                  All you’re doing is continuing to shame voters who didn’t vote for your candidate, even after these voters told your candidate what their priorities were.

                  The only substantial thing Kamala ran on was that she wasn’t Trump. Outside of not being Trump she is a shell of a human being who has no real values and will always change her views based on the campaign contributions she receives. Voters saw through her fake personality.

                  Continuing to try and shame voters for not supporting your candidate isn’t going to accomplish anything, much in the same way Obama and Hillary trying to shame voters accomplished little as well.

                  The DNC can’t even beat a buffoon like Trump because they are so bought and paid for by corporate and dark money PACs.

                  Maybe try stop trying to blame voters and focus your energies in that direction.

                  • nomous@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    59 minutes ago

                    I don’t disagree with anything you’ve said except.

                    Continuing to try and shame voters for not supporting your candidate isn’t going to accomplish anything

                    Who was MY candidate? I had to vote for the same milquetoast dem every other functional adult did. I weighed the options and made a decision. If some hypothetical non-voters think they have a better solution let’s see it, they should be ashamed. Sitting in basements screeching online doesn’t accomplish anything so let’s fucking go.

                    I’m just waiting for the revolution to start, that’s what we all want right?

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        “Your” party didn’t even show up, why would anyone listen to them?

        Edit: hey at least a couple of you learned how to vote! Maybe try doing that irl and not just on the internet!

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          “Your” party didn’t even show up, why would anyone listen to them?

          Progressives don’t have a party that even considers representing them.

          • nomous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Progressives turned out to vote for the obviously less dangerous to America candidate.

            Terminally online internet leftists sat at home in their basements and want feel like they’re revolutionaries.

            Start a revolution champ, we’re all waiting.