Summary

Donald Trump’s transition team has bypassed standard FBI background checks for key cabinet nominees, relying instead on private investigators, as reported by CNN.

This breaks decades-old norms meant to vet candidates for criminal history and conflicts of interest.

Controversial appointees include Matt Gaetz (attorney general), Tulsi Gabbard (director of national intelligence), and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (health secretary), all facing scrutiny for past investigations, pro-Russian views, or personal admissions.

Critics argue Trump seeks to undermine traditional vetting, with potential security risks tied to bypassing these checks.

  • whithom@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    3 days ago

    We will take whatever he gives. The US voters approved him. They want this. They chose this, and everything that comes from it.

    • GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      81
      ·
      3 days ago

      This. There is no authority above the authoritarian. His word is law now. Whatever Our Glorious Cheeto wishes is now US doctrine.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      He got more votes than he ever did in the previous elections, and won the popular vote for the first time. God damn.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I’m not even sure what world be the worse outcome, more fraud and cheating from Trump or that so many people genuinely voted for him.

          Sadly my gut tells me that real votes are the worse situation, and also the true one.

      • whithom@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yup. There will be lots of opportunities to say “well, I hope you didn’t vote for trump if you wanted ______”

        Healthcare, retirement, any kind of social service, etc etc.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      3 days ago

      Thats not true. There are at least 71 million people here who voted against it. Thats a lot of people.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        There were even more who couldn’t be bothered to get off their asses and vote at all. They stood by and allowed this to happen without caring enough to try and stop it.

        • zeppo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          I have a friend who says “I’m not political” and I’m just what? So you don’t have any opinion on whether immigrants should get fucked or gay people should have rights? His position is “I see so many families and friends torn apart by disagreements so I’m just not political”. Okay. It makes me think he’s kind of a dolt. I don’t feel like it’s possible to not have an opinion on social issues at the least.

          • zeppo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Plenty of voter suppression in swing states, like unenrolling people from voter registration lists. Also the ongoing issues like 4 hour lines in urban areas, due to not enough voting facilities and machines, and short or no lines in rural areas and suburbs. Also, how it’s easier for people with certain types of jobs to go vote but hourly workers etc have a harder time getting there since voting day isn’t a holiday.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      This is why we’re supposed to have separation of powers. Any competent senate, even if the same party would insist in this before confirming. A senate full of sycophants on the other hand ….