During his presidential campaign, Kennedy developed a national profile for his criticism of the Covid vaccine and childhood immunizations.

Summary

President-elect Donald Trump has nominated Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an outspoken anti-vaccine activist, to lead the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

Known for promoting debunked claims linking vaccines to autism, Kennedy’s appointment has sparked concerns within federal health agencies, with some FDA staff reportedly considering resignations.

Kennedy, who previously ran for president before endorsing Trump, has hinted at plans to overhaul the FDA, ban fluoride in drinking water, and reduce ultra-processed foods.

His nomination marks a significant potential shift for U.S. public health policy.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    2·
    55 minutes ago

    What on Earth is the NIH thinking right now?

    I mean, what if an moon landing skeptic took over NASA? It’s like that. They literally produce this mountain of evidence and organize this stuff, and… yeah.

  • leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl
    10·
    5 hours ago

    i think i remember in the debates, maybe it was JaDonald Vance, saying “it is either we choose to rely in science people, or rely on wisdom and common sense Trump has”.

    this is that wisdom.

  • Valthorn@feddit.nu
    140·
    10 hours ago

    To all you who didn’t vote because “Harris isn’t good either”: You chose this. You let this happen.

    • Kalkaline @leminal.space
      32·
      7 hours ago

      When kids start dying of Whooping Cough, I’m going to strongly encourage people to post their anger and direct it to not only Republican voters, but also to people who stayed home because “it doesn’t matter.”

    • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      18·
      9 hours ago

      It’s quite pathetic how so many of these stories have top comments that all blame voters for the decades of compound failures by the Democratic party.

      You have it backwards my friend, voters cannot fail the party. It’s the party’s job to win voters, but instead, they shed 14 million voters over the last election.

      Remind me, how many users are on Lemmy?

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        13·
        5 hours ago

        “Individuals have no responsibility to be informed or compassionate whatsoever. That’s some corporate fuckheads’ role”

        Why do people keep on insisting on this dumbass bullshit?

        • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
          2·
          5 hours ago

          So just so we’re clear here, you acknowledge that it is “corporate fuckheads” who run the DNC, but insist they aren’t to blame for losing 14m votes.

          In fact, it’s actually my fault, your neighbor’s fault, and anyone of voting age who isn’t employed by the DNC.

      • Zexks@lemmy.world
        7·
        6 hours ago

        And when he dissolves elections, like he also said he would, who’s going to win you over then.

        • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
          3·
          6 hours ago

          Again, the Democratic party lost this election, not me, or any other voter.

          So while you identified a potential future problem, it feels like you’ve misdiagnosed who’s to blame for that possibility.

      • capital_sniff@lemmy.world
        3·
        5 hours ago

        The Dems put up a good fight. Biden needed to leave earlier. Harris could’ve had an actual answer to what she would’ve done differently. The reality is they were fighting a huge uphill battle. We’ve got an extremely ignorant and uninformed citizenry with little understanding of the functioning of government. I’m talking about Americans a proud and reactionary group of people. There was zero chance after picking Kamala that the Democratic party was going to pivot from their neo-liberal views and what movement they did was towards the center.

        Now that they’ve lost so decisively maybe we’ll see a window to move the party in a progressive direction. Personally I think the Dems need to get back to supporting labor unions. If we are going to “reindustrialize” this country because we are doing war with China then we should want strong labor organization. Get some progressives to run on policies that put people first instead of property and capital.

        That would probably require getting money out of politics. In the meantime focus on continuing to improve the quality of life in blue states and blue cities. As far as the voters they didn’t fail the party they failed the country. We are going to see a bunch of our fellow citizens lose more of their rights.

      • JakJak98@lemmy.world
        11·
        7 hours ago

        So many downvotes for such an objectively true statement. It’s not “we the party” it’s “we the people” if dems didn’t win that’s objectively the parties fault for not winning us over.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.mlEnglish
      3·
      7 hours ago

      Democrats were perfectly capable of enacting electoral reform in the blue states they control, allowing these people who felt unrepresented to be involved and engaged. Some of them might have picked the democrats as their 2nd pick.

      Why did the democrats say no to these easy extra votes? Why did they say no to having multiple chances at defeating the republicans? Why did they prioritize restricting election access to 3rd parties over defeating the republicans?

  • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    15·
    7 hours ago

    Has Trump rehired anyone from his previous administration? I know he fired a shit ton of them but I know a few managed to stay on.

    Because if this is all new people, it’s very telling and I have a feeling it means it’s going to be more dangerous and not less.

    I feel like the only people who can do anything powerful would be the front line government workers and contractors. If they all quit their jobs en masse on January 20th, it might prevent the new administration from doing even more dangerous shit.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    30·
    10 hours ago

    Next time ebola breaks out, I half expect him to eat a live bat on TV to prove it doesn’t exist and immediately become patient zero right here

        • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          9·
          10 hours ago

          I don’t know what about that comment signaled to you that I’d be okay with my family members that live in a red state dying because RFK fucked with vaccines, but I’m not ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Where you live is a location, not an ideology.

  • greenshirtdenimjeans@sh.itjust.works
    15·
    10 hours ago

    This administration is turning out to be one of the most experienced in history. I have extremely high hopes for these picks, the combined knowledge is unheard of, nobody could imagine all of these top individuals.

  • bamboo@lemm.ee
    19·
    11 hours ago

    I don’t know how he thinks he’ll reduce ultra-processed foods but that’s probably not the worst. Other stuff is 🤮

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      18·
      9 hours ago

      Depends on what he means by “ultra-processed”, but you can bet that it’s probably not a reasonable criteria that he’ll be using.

      The man isn’t rational, and doesn’t base his conclusions on sound reasoning.

      Note the call to lessen regulations around “raw milk, chelating compounds, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine”. That’s pretty insane.

      And I can almost be certain that what they’ll do is eliminate funding for snap benefits and school lunches going to what they’ll classify as “ultra processed foods”, without adjusting funding to account for what they left behind being significantly more expensive. Some definitions of “ultra-processed” include things like “store bought bread”, “frozen meals”, “soup concentrate”, “yoghurt” and “sausage”.
      Call me cynical, but I think if you apply the stricter work requirements for benefits they always want, while reducing the scope of the benefits to cover fewer things, and almost nothing helpful for the people with the severe time restrictions the work requirements can cause you’ll end up seeing people use the benefits far less often, because they give less usable food for the money. Then they’ll use that to justify reducing the size of the program even further.

      We expect people making school lunches to make hundreds of meals that finish at the same time, to have the meal be nutritionally complete, tasty, and now also not use frozen or premade ingredients. We give them literally $1 for the ingredients for these meals, and maybe another $2 for operational overhead like labor costs and equipment.
      Saying you can’t use canned tomato sauce, peanut butter, pre-packaged bread or ground meats is basically just cutting funding for feeding children under the guise of not paying for a scary sounding classification of food.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      37·
      11 hours ago

      In practice what it probably means is removing all the modern preservatives and added vitamins/minerals. Who’s excited to get goiter and pellagra?!

      Doing that would also mean a return to traditional preservatives: salt and sugar. Because we don’t have enough of that in the American diet already.