A group representing nearly all major automakers on Monday, Nov. 2 urged U.S. lawmakers to pass a permanent ban on Chinese vehicles when they return next week for a quick session after the midterm congressional elections.

In September, the Senate sponsors of the bipartisan effort to ban Chinese vehicles agreed to delay an effort to fast-track the bill until November despite overwhelming support.

Some congressional aides and auto lobbyists think if Democrats win control of Congress there may not be enough time to approve the Chinese vehicle ban before this session ends in December.

  • gridlock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    9 days ago

    They can’t make cars under $20000 and only Slate can potentially make an EV under $25000. They can’t handle higher fuel economy standards. They can’t figure out how to sell anything other than trucks.

    So why do they need to ban cars that they have no appetite to build?

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          You’re telling me these companies can compete against the deep pockets of the Chinese government? This is like arguing that mom and pop stores can compete against Walmart “but they just don’t want to.”

          Care to detail exactly how China is able to build and sell cars so much cheaper than any other car manufacturer in the world, especially when they’re so new to it? Do you think its some secret sauce that nobody in the world has yet to figure out or just a temporary ploy to seize control of an entire industry before transforming into the very enemy you speak of now.

            • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              There are only three remaining domestic manufacturers (Ford, GM, Tesla) and they only make up a minority of sales in the US. It really puzzles me why so many people think the US automotive market is entirely made up of American companies when it so obviously isn’t. No other automaker in the world is able to build and sell vehicles as cheap as these Chinese brands are doing and that’s because the Chinese government is paying the difference. That isn’t a sustainable model long term. These prices can’t last forever. Some people think we should do what China is doing with subsidies, but do you think sending even more of our tax dollars to Elon Musk, Mary Barra, or Jim Farley is the answer? That’s what that solution looks like.

              As far as margins go, you can Google this information. GM’s net profit margin for 2025 was 1%, Ford’s was -4%, and Teslas was 4%. What room do they have here? If they drop them even further, where do they get the money to further develop EVs?

              I do agree that an outright ban is too far, but I do support heavy tariffs at the least as anything less is just sacrificing some of the few remaining manufacturing jobs left in this country and shipping them overseas all for an extremely temporary benefit.

                • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Those are all fine questionsn but until you actually have the answer to them, who are you or anyone else to pass judgement or make proclamations about them?

                  BYD may be heavily subsidized, but they’re also comparatively new and young, able to innovate and respond to market demands, fundamental practices their older monopolistic competitors have long ago lost interest in doing.

                  They’re not able to innovate and respond quickly because they’re new. They’re able to do this because they have a blank check to do so with plenty of local ‘competitors’ in the same situation; the whole 10,000 apes sitting at typewriters scenario. We can see the same thing here in the US with venture capitalists funding all sorts of startups and look where that has gotten us. Tesla is also new and young but we haven’t seen any innovations from them in about a decade now, just to demonstrate my point.

                  What new innovations are you referring to specifically by the way? AFAIK the appeal of Chinese EVs is that they’re selling for 1/4 the price of any other nation’s EVs. This wasn’t accomplished through innovation. It was accomplished through deep pockets. I don’t know of any feature present in Chinese EVs that someone else hasn’t already figured out.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          They really can’t actually compete. The upfront costs to make a factory and assembly line and all that automation {or human labor) is astronomically higher in price and slower in build in the US, compared to China. There really is no way the US can compete with China on pricing in manufacturing vehicles.

          Which is why it should just be left to die off instead of propping up the industry that moved half their plants to Mexico, anyhow.

    • Malica@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Because they’re fat cats that need to rig the game to get people to accept how awful they are, when they’re the only choice.

    • luckybart@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      My 2¢ on Slate: if $25k is meant to be cheap they missed the mark. I’d have one for $15k, maybe.

      I know the whole sector is inflated in the US, but that’s also why bringing in Chinese EVs is not a bad idea.

    • Triumph@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      I get what you’re saying, but capitalism and free markets are different things.

  • voxthefox@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 days ago

    Fuck off, maybe should have spent all that lobbying money to prop up a dying industry on innovating your product, may you all join Kodak & Blockbuster down the road to obscurity.

    • nastronot@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Easier to ban than innovate.

      CEOs aren’t innovators. MBAs aren’t engineers. We’ve got highly complicated companies run by people who can’t print to pdf.

      • Malica@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        Our system is built to enable and promote abusers, they don’t make for good decision makers. They’re good at making cruel decisions and that makes the line go up, that’s why they’re in charge. They will still make terrible decisions though.

  • bagsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 days ago

    Because fuck the consumers who just want a cheap reliable car and not a $100k f-900 maga truck.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      you want an economical, practical, reliable car that you’re happy with and that will develop brand loyalty?

      too bad, best I can do is something that has a touchscreen removedpit you won’t be able to use in sunlight and without taking your eyes off the road, headlights that will blind oncoming traffic at all times but especially some of the most dangerous times, and reliability that will have you back in the dealership every few months for issues that are overly complicated to fix!