• archomrade [he/him]@midwest.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    If your willing to accept a little genocide in exchange for not having to convince anyone of anything, sure

    Wait actually is this you convincing no-genocide voters that a little genocide is fine? Woa that was slick!

    • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      Oh yeah *just *convince the Democrats. Sure thing, I’ll have it done by Tuesday. Honestly I feel stupid for not thinking of just convincing them. Why has no one tried this before? /S

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Believe me, I’m not rooting for it (or don’t, Idgaf).

            Democrats are more principled than Trump voters though, if one party can survive running on it it’s not the democrats.

              • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.socialOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                I don’t want to stop anyone voting against Trump, I just think centrists are expecting an awful lot from a constituency that historically underperformed when enthusiasm is low (spoiler: it’s never been this low)

    • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      What is a ‘little genocide’? I thought your whole shtick was that genocide was genocide and ‘less’ is still genocide.

      Are you conceding that there are degrees and less is better than more?

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Are you conceding that there’s a choice between convincing people genocide is ok vs convincing democrats it’s not, and you’d prefer the former?

        • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 months ago

          Voting is the only binary choice. You can do whatever other ‘choices’ you’re babbling about at the same time if you want.

            • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              The substance of the issue for me is saving Palestinian lives which is one of the many reasons I’m voting for Biden in 2024.

                • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  I’m chatting online with a stranger about it though- so we’re both putting in about the same amount of work on the issue ;)

                • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I for one am doing more than that AND voting. Turns out voting has never impeded me from participating in other forms of activism, isn’t that magical?

                  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.socialOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Except no activism you’ve done has been to convince anyone here that there’s a chance democrats are in trouble for supporting genocide

                    Yall seem really concerned about reassuring each other that you’ll vote for Biden, but little effort convincing anyone that Biden might lose because of this.