• mosiacmango@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Lol at you talking like Trump isn’t going to 100x the bomb shipments to Israel on day 1.

    The dude that told Bibi that he needed “to finish the job quickly.” The dudes whose son in law talked about how much beutiful beachfront property Gaza has.

    That guy is somehow the guy you’re propping up right now as better than Biden on gaza. That guy.

    • Zement@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s because they don’t care. They are Maga-Trolls pushing for power seize. That’s all… the only genocide they are interested in, is the one they are planning.

        • LePoisson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think it’s more along the lines of you’re being disingenuous with the lens you’re applying. Sure, the current admin, and future Harris if elected, can certainly be criticized on foreign policy around Israel and Gaza. The flip side is the context that Trump would be so much worse and doing the same shit except even worse. Harris openly discusses a two state solution.

          The point is, the two presidential candidates do differ and you’re implying they don’t. Regardless of your political bent, I’m pretty far on the left side, you have to admit in reality we have a two party system and one is better for the future of the people of Gaza.

          Hence, we should all vote accordingly. I think mostly it’s that you’re implying we shouldn’t vote Harris when the alternative is worse.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      They know that they won’t be in Gaza getting bombed, so they’re free to live their progressive healing fantasy pipedream while using pretend compassion for Palestinians to push their privileged political narrative.