• I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Is it their dog? Is it raised for food, or would the person otherwise starve? If the answers are yes, then no, I don’t find it cruel. I might find it distasteful, but not cruel. Does that answer surprise you? Good. Maybe you’ll start to see that morals are not universal and not everyone has to conform to yours. That’s the kind of thinking of a child.

    Also, penetrating bolt guns are a thing and yes, they do kill.

    • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Lol you are changing the hypothetical cause you know exactly that this would be cruel and that you would try to stop it if you saw it happening. It’s so dishonest.

    • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Also, *penetrating* bolt guns are a thing and yes, they do kill.

      Nope, they stun as well.

      The bolt penetrates the skull of the animal, enters the cranium, and catastrophically damages the cerebrum and part of the cerebellum. Concussion causes destruction of vital centers of the brain and an increase in intracranial pressure, causing the animal to lose consciousness. This method is currently the most effective type of stunning, since it physically destroys brain matter (increasing the probability of a successful stun), while also leaving the brain stem intact and thus ensuring the heart continues to pump during the exsanguination.[2] One disadvantage of this method is that brain matter is allowed to enter the blood stream, possibly contaminating other tissue with bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE, colloquially known as mad cow disease).”

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captive_bolt_pistol