The malnourished and badly bruised son of a parenting advice YouTuber politely asks a neighbor to take him to the nearest police station in newly released video from the day his mother and her business partner were arrested on child abuse charges in southern Utah.

The 12-year-old son of Ruby Franke, a mother of six who dispensed advice to millions via a popular YouTube channel, had escaped through a window and approached several nearby homes until someone answered the door, according to documents released Friday by the Washington County Attorney’s office.

Crime scene photos, body camera video and interrogation tapes were released a month after Franke and business partner Jodi Hildebrandt, a mental health counselor, were each sentenced to up to 30 years in prison. A police investigation determined religious extremism motivated the women to inflict horrific abuse on Franke’s children, Washington County Attorney Eric Clarke announced Friday.

“The women appeared to fully believe that the abuse they inflicted was necessary to teach the children how to properly repent for imagined ‘sins’ and to cast the evil spirits out of their bodies,” Clarke said.

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The bitterest part?

    • “Do not harm little children” - Church of Satan
    • “One should strive to act with compassion and empathy toward all creatures in accordance with reason.” - The Satanic Temple

    Are you getting the picture? People who claim themselves to side with Satan are more eager to show compassion than people who claim to fight against a devil. It immediately reminds me what my grandma used to say, that “Protestants love the devil so much that they talk about him nonstop”. (Not that the Catholic church is any better, I know.)

    [I’m not Satanist, regardless of my nickname, by the way.]

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s just that she’s crazy. Christianity in no way encourages abuse of children or even people who are demon possessed.

      Psalm 127:3 ESV‬ [3] Behold, children are a heritage from the Lord, the fruit of the womb a reward.

      ‭Matthew 19:13-15 ESV‬ [13] Then children were brought to him that he might lay his hands on them and pray. The disciples rebuked the people, [14] but Jesus said, “Let the little children come to me and do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of heaven.” [15] And he laid his hands on them and went away.

      ‭Luke 17:2 ESV‬ [2] It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were cast into the sea than that he should cause one of these little ones to sin.

      It’s just a paranoid/crazy person masquerading as religious.

      Edit: turns out she isn’t even a Christian, she’s a Mormon. I guessed she was a Protestant Christian from your message.

      • BaldProphet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Christianity in no way encourages abuse of children or even people who are demon possessed.

        Neither does the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or its members, who read and believe in the same verses you quoted.

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Give Deuteronomy 21:18-21 a check. Abridged version for you: unruly children should be stoned. What she did is biblically justified. You’ll also find some “fun” stuff that should guide her actions in Exodus 21:15-17 and Psalm 137:8-9.

        Of course, someone could play that game that Christian denominations love to play - where you redefine the canon for to include/exclude books based on which actions you want to justify. But that’s from the Pentateuch, so kind of hard to brush off. Why is this disgusting shit there on first place?

        In the meantime, the Satanists actually have rules to act with compassion and to not harm children. Yup.

        Edit: turns out she isn’t even a Christian, she’s a Mormon. I guessed she was a Protestant Christian from your message.

        Christians also love to play the “that group there is not Christian, even if they follow the Bible and call themselves Christians”. I see this fairly often here… except that it’s towards Protestants (that, acc. to the local mindset, includes Mormons, for the annoyance of both).

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Oh boy! Bible verses taken out of context! Let’s look into these, shall we?

          Deuteronomy was about preparing Israel for the coming of Messiah. It’s not a command for today’s Christian people. Same with Exodus. They exist as historical record.

          Psalm 137 is lamenting what Babylon did to Israel. It was an eye for an eye rhetoric, as the Babylonians had murdered their children. Again, Psalms aren’t prescriptions. They’re songs written by a Jewish king.

          Mormons aren’t Christian. They reject the Trinity for a start and have additional scripture, just like Islam with their Qur’an or Jehovah’s witnesses with the Watchtower publications.

          • BaldProphet@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Ah yes, the continuously exhausting tradition of Christians who believe in one doctrine introduced hundreds of years after the death of Jesus Christ (trinitarianism) denying the beliefs of Christians who believe in other doctrines introduced after the death of Jesus Christ.

            Our beliefs have much more in common than you think.

            • Flax@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              The trinity is literally in the Bible and Jesus Himself literally referenced it.

              • BaldProphet@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                The concept of the trinity defined by the Nicene Creed is vastly elaborated compared to the verses in the New Testament that refer to it. At the same time, there are several instances where the trinitarian view of God is nonsensical, such as when the Father announces His acceptance of Jesus’ baptism, or the numerous times Jesus stated that He was “returning” to “His Father”. How would a single being return to Himself? Why would He engage in ventriloquism at the scene of His baptism?

                Regardless, we both believe in Jesus Christ, even if we believe in different things about Him. We are therefore both Christians.

                • Flax@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  What you described the trinity as being was Modalism, which the Nicene creed doesn’t teach. The definition of the trinity is in the Athanasian Creed.

                  To lay what the Bible clearly teaches:

                  There is one God. Jesus is God. Jesus always existed. The Holy Spirit is God. The Holy Spirit is referenced in both testaments. The Father is God. The Father always existed. Jesus prays to the Father. The Father and the Holy spirit are both present alongside each other at Jesus’ baptism. Jesus flat out equates the Father, Son and Holy Spirit together when talking of Baptism.

                  God is above creation and our laws. We only understand our unitarian nature - that we can only be in one place at one time. Just like how we being three dimensional creatures can only relate to three dimensions. So it wouldn’t make sense for God to abide by our laws, but to be manifest in three persons spanning time and space and the laws of this universe.

                  • BaldProphet@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    There is one God. Jesus is God. Jesus always existed. The Holy Spirit is God. The Holy Spirit is referenced in both testaments. The Father is God. The Father always existed. Jesus prays to the Father. The Father and the Holy spirit are both present alongside each other at Jesus’ baptism. Jesus flat out equates the Father, Son and Holy Spirit together when talking of Baptism.

                    This is exactly the same doctrine as the Godhead. God the Father is God. God the Son, Jesus Christ, is God. The Holy Spirit is God. Three together in unity, all present during the baptism of Christ. All eternal.

                    I don’t see a disagreement here.