RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works to Android@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoGoogle must crack open Android for third-party stores, rules Epic judgewww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up183cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up183external-linkGoogle must crack open Android for third-party stores, rules Epic judgewww.theverge.comRmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works to Android@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square26fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarecatsup@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 months agorofl at this title trying to victimize google for being monopolistic assholes
minus-squareSestren@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·3 months agoHow does the title victimize Google?.. It literally just summarizes the article, and then in the first sentence of the actual article they flat out call Google an illegal monopoly.
minus-squarecatsup@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·edit-23 months ago“Must crack open” crack open has negative connotations. “Must allow” is a much more neutral way to phrase it. “Epic Judge” The judge isn’t epic’s, it’s just the judge that happens to be dealing with this case.
minus-squarevrek@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoOk, they got me on the second one… I was seriously wondering how epic had their own judge and it wasn’t conflict of interest.
minus-squareSatouKazuma@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoWelcome to America, where the judges might as well wear racing suits full of sponsors. Actually, that might be an improvement on the status quo.
minus-squareNight Monkey@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoLots of Google removed Gobbler’s around here it seems
rofl at this title trying to victimize google for being monopolistic assholes
How does the title victimize Google?.. It literally just summarizes the article, and then in the first sentence of the actual article they flat out call Google an illegal monopoly.
“Must crack open”
crack open has negative connotations. “Must allow” is a much more neutral way to phrase it.
“Epic Judge”
The judge isn’t epic’s, it’s just the judge that happens to be dealing with this case.
Judge:
Dudes: Whoa… epic!
Ok, they got me on the second one… I was seriously wondering how epic had their own judge and it wasn’t conflict of interest.
Welcome to America, where the judges might as well wear racing suits full of sponsors. Actually, that might be an improvement on the status quo.
Lots of Google removed Gobbler’s around here it seems