- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
cross-posted from: https://piefed.zip/c/[email protected]/p/1650861/pluralism-go-brrr
cross-posted from: https://piefed.zip/c/[email protected]/p/1650861/pluralism-go-brrr
Nope. Just blessed with the ability to summarize ideologies in a succinct fashion.
Pack it up, friends. Teslasaur has defeated hundreds of years of anarchist political theory, it’s all over for us.
If by " summarize ideologies in a succinct fashion" you mean “be completely wrong and lack any understanding of the ideology” the sure.
The shorthand of “libertarianism, but even more ludicrous” sums it up well.
Cool, so you’re just ignorant and proudly so. Gotcha.
Oh, do enlighten me what part of the statement is untrue and start from there. Instead of going to name calling.
Anarchism is absolutely part of libertarianism, so that is check one.
Ludicrous, because of it’s inherent opposition to structure undermines the idea of a coherent framework of ideals in a society.
Keep on showcasing how ignorant you are. Go read a book, child.
I’ve read plenty of them, but please. Bring your own interpretation instead of being a little condescending brat.
Mhm, sure you have, bubba.
Indeed I have, but please keep embarrassing yourself by not even countering and just going to name calling.
I suggest reading “Debt” by David Graeber to get a better understanding of the economic effect in social structures. There are plenty of examples of historical societies that have attempted and failed at anarchy. Most of them fail when the people that do the work society needs, get used by those that do not work, eventually leading to violence. That violence goes in opposition of the social agreement, although not necessarily, as there is nothing inherent about anarchism that would hinder violence.
https://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionA.html
https://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionF.html