• SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      Even disregarding the orientation, people hate auto-next on YouTube, but will tolerate/accept endless scroll for shorts, especially because they’re short.

      • noerdman@discuss.tchncs.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Maybe it’s the low risk? If it’s just a shitty short, you haven’t lost four hours. There’s got to be a piece of gold in there, somewhere.

    • noerdman@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      When smartphones were still a new thing, I kept preaching to take videos sideways because all useful playback devices were sideways. Man, how that has changed…

  • _____@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    Unfortunately, it is genius.

    Most people I see are hugely addicted on doom scrolling content and shorts are part of it.

    If you haven’t hade use of selecting “not interested” on videos. You should now. I barely get brain rot recommended to me but sometimes the alg is very persistent.

  • sus@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    pretty simple. [the video site] sees how popular tiktok is and wants to get a slice of that “short format” pie. It incentivizes content creators to make content that fits the format by promoting it on the algorithm. If there is a shortage of content in that format (and for that type of audience), anything semi-decent will do, eg. highlights from longer videos. As the algorithm needs to fill that quota of videos somehow