• silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Hardly; it’s largely a matter of how quickly we phase out fossil fuels. Wait longer, and you get to scrap equipment before the ends of its normal useful life instead of getting full use out of what you pay for.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      We’ve already waited way too long. That’s the point. Talking about it like you are makes it sound like we haven’t missed our window for slow and methodical transitions but that part of the conversation happened in the 80s and we decided that path was for pussies. Now here we are in the “October hurricanes are flooding Tennessee” timeline. If that sounds like the right time to be discussing getting the most out of our remaining diesel engines then you’re not paying attention.

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yes, we’ve wanted too long for zero impact.

        We haven’t waited too long to still end up with a habitable planet. Failing to act now puts that at risk.