an angrier terrarian@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year ago98.32 kbs of rule datalemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up12
arrow-up12image98.32 kbs of rule datalemmy.blahaj.zonean angrier terrarian@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square2fedilink
minus-squareu/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoFor the sake of your data, I won’t do it, but I absolutely could embed this image into a comment, and if you don’t have much data, you could get screwed: https://www.eso.org/public/archives/images/large/eso1719a.jpg It’s a 1.3GB image of 3 nebulae. Its resolution is 93031x35412 which makes it nearly 3.3Gpix. Yes, that’s gigapixels. Source: https://www.eso.org/public/images/eso1719a/ The original is 9.2GB. There’s also this 8.8Gpix 24.6GB Milky Way mosaic, but that’s not available as JPEG in full-res: https://www.eso.org/public/images/eso1242a/
For the sake of your data, I won’t do it, but I absolutely could embed this image into a comment, and if you don’t have much data, you could get screwed: https://www.eso.org/public/archives/images/large/eso1719a.jpg
It’s a 1.3GB image of 3 nebulae. Its resolution is 93031x35412 which makes it nearly 3.3Gpix. Yes, that’s gigapixels.
Source: https://www.eso.org/public/images/eso1719a/
The original is 9.2GB.
There’s also this 8.8Gpix 24.6GB Milky Way mosaic, but that’s not available as JPEG in full-res: https://www.eso.org/public/images/eso1242a/