My threat model is against mass surveillance. This is one of the hardest threat models to defend against and to justify, because (at least here in the US), mass surveillance has become normalized. I’ve heard people directly tell me that “privacy is weird.” I’m not here to shoot down the Nothing to hide argument literally labelled on Wikipedia as “a logical fallacy,” instead, I want to take my own approach to show just how unnatural mass surveillance is.

Picture this: Your best friend tells you that he heard rumors that someone put cameras in your house and was actively spying on you. That is super creepy, but you brush it off and say that nobody would do that, because who would care that much about you? However, when you get home, you look around and find multiple dozen hidden cameras everywhere. Think about how you’re feeling right now, knowing that you’re being watched. Even though you know that you’re being watched, but have no idea who has been watching you, what they have seen, or how long they’ve been watching you, it’s disillusioning and creepy to find out that what your friend said was true.

Then, you do some digging online and find out that everyone in your neighborhood is also being watched. Oh, it’s fine then, right? Suddenly it’s much better that you’re not alone. No! More surveillance is not a good thing. People fall into the false belief that as long as it’s not targeted surveillance or a personal attack that it’s suddenly fine, that you will just blend in with the noise. Your data is valuable, and spying in any capacity is NOT normal. Remember: The situation never changed, you are still being watched, you just found out that not only you, but everyone around you is also being spied on.

You still have no idea who is watching you, and it’s even worse to find out that it might not just be one person, that anyone can buy this data for cheap. Data like this can be used to stalk you, drain your bank account, read intimate personal texts, rig elections, manipulate you into buying things you never intended to buy, and so much more. This is the state of mass surveillance and it needs to stop. It’s not a conspiracy, the dystopia is today.

Mass surveillance is not normal. Privacy also isn’t normal: it’s a right, instead.

    • adr1an@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      And, chelsea manning. I’d love to see more whistleblowers in the world. That’s the kind of mass sousveillance we need!

      • Wildly_Utilize@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        29 days ago

        uh wasnt his passport revoked mid flight and the plane landed in russia against his will?

        hes been basically trapped there

      • letsgo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        Yes and no. Everywhere “Western” has an extradition treaty with the USA so there’s no point fleeing to any of those. Russia isn’t a great choice but if he values his freedom it’s probably the least worst option.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    28 days ago

    i talked to people that had a difficulty grasping the concept of “if you delete a post, it might still be stored on the server”

    the obscure and closed tech we have makes it hard for laymen to get a true grasp on whats truly happening.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      God forbid every American woman gets a few months paid time maternity leave to heal and bond with her child.

      • kmaismith@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        30 days ago

        But if the child is well bonded, how will he grow up to be an insecure, dependable consumer?

  • Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Lol there is a ring camera on every door and an Alexa in every home. Mass surveillance is so normal they got “normies” to pay for it monthly.

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Disappointing that the top comment is this dismissive take (whether or not it’s factually true).

      If the best response we can muster is cynicism, we’ll get what we deserve.

    • The 8232 Project@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      There is a house that put a Ring camera on their fence… facing nothing but the public sidewalk and the properties of other people. Thankfully, they live on a common path for schoolers to walk home, who happily harass them by ringing it 100 times a day.

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    Define normal…

    If you go by the definition of being the most common thing, the current surveillance capitalist dystopia is literally the new normal.

    What you mean is that you feel it shouldn’t be normal. And you’re right. But sadly, it is now undeniably the norm.

  • friendly_ghost@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    I find this argument compelling:

    “We have a physiological need for privacy. Mammals in particular respond poorly to surveillance. We consider it a threat because animals in the wild are tracked by predators, and it makes us feel like prey.”

    Taken from this TEDx talk: https://youtu.be/jVeqAemtC6w Quoted bit starts at 5:45

    • My Password Is 1234@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      Fun fact: In poland, there is the Panoptykon Foundation, which analyzes introduced laws in terms of privacy and human rights. Many laws have already been withdrawn thanks to them.

      It’s just a shame that the government doesn’t do it on its own, but we need a special foundation to do it…

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    I’m not sure if you have looked around much but mass surveillance is pretty normal these days.

    Terrible isn’t it. I just want to be left alone.

  • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Your heart is in the right place, but relying on what Wikipedia calls a fallacy and on implicit “natural rights” both undermine your argument severely. Your fourth paragraph is far and away the most valuable one.

  • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    In all honesty, I believe it falls on each of us to educate as much people as possible in the actual dangers of mass surveillance and what are the potential options to minimize it’s impact.

    For example, I’ve been advocating for privacy within my family, friends and other acquaintances for years now. Only recently have I managed to get my wife to start caring (some fearmongering was required) and have gotten a friend from church already on track to eliminating Google, Crapple, mainstream social networks and even self hosting. Some people at work have been reaching out to ask me how they can start moving away from the big tech overreach, and now even my kids have gotten their friends on Simplex, which have made some of their parents move to it as well.

    Again, it’s taken me over 7 years to manage this little, but it’s something. If all of us keep doing this, avoiding getting to the point of annoying others (though I’ve annoyed quite a few persons with this, but whatever) more and more people will start moving in that direction.

    Just getting some people to change from chrome to brave, which is one of the easiest things to do without making them change their streamlines, or move to Signal from SMS and WhatsApp, is already making headway.

    If we get tired and stop preaching security, the surveillance wins. At least that’s how I see it.

  • Zexks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    Mass surveillance is absolutely natural. What do you think it was like for the last 10+ thousand years in villages and towns around the world. Everyone knew everyone, reputations and word of mouth was the currency of the millennia. Privacy as we know it has only exist for a very short period of time. The only reason we even got the privacy we had for a bit was because it was too much data and there were too many people for any one village to know everyone. Computers solved that. I don’t like the idea of cameras everywhere but as someone who’s been robbed repeatedly and watched others go through the same and with the utter failure that is our current legal system and our over reliance or for some twisted belief that human perception is somehow the end all be all of evidence or to determine the truth I welcome more public recording if it means I dont have to rely on some cop or other official to back or refute my testimony. I want a safe society not one where some random jackass can lose rheir mind and just blow off hundreds or more lives in a whim. There’s too many people now for the “it’s just a few people” argument. When you’re dealing with billions of individuals even a .00001% of fuckers is still a lot of fuckers. Come up with a way to stop them before hand without recording everyone and I’m down. Till then I’ll trust a video recording over a personal testimony any day of the week.

    Oh look why got posted like a day after

    https://lemm.ee/post/43071932

    Everyone seems to acknowledge it there.

    • nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      All those negative things are happening in a society that implemented mass surveillance so clearly it doesn’t help. Recording a crime doesn’t prevent it and if there’s no incentive or funding to make sure justice is served afterwards the recording is useless. I think you’re mistaken in who this surveillance is for: it doesn’t exist to improve your life but to empower corporations and state against you.