Everyone knows that electric vehicles are supposed to be better for the planet than gas cars. That’s the driving reason behind a global effort to transition toward batteries.

But what about the harms caused by mining for battery minerals? And coal-fired power plants for the electricity to charge the cars? And battery waste? Is it really true that EVs are better?

The answer is yes. But Americans are growing less convinced.

The net benefits of EVs have been frequently fact-checked, including by NPR. "No technology is perfect, but the electric vehicles are going to offer a significant benefit as compared to the internal combustion engine vehicles," Jessika Trancik, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told NPR this spring.

It’s important to ask these questions about EVs’ hidden costs, Trancik says. But they have been answered “exhaustively” — her word — and a widerange of organizations have confirmed that EVs still beat gas.

  • atan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Most BEVs are charged over night, where only Hydro or Geothermal makes power”

    Maybe in Iceland; anywhere with wind and nuclear power, this really is not the case.

    • nexusband@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      And in most areas, how much share have nuclear and wind? Somewhere around 30-40% combined on average

      • atan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        About 30% in Europe/US; half that in China.

        Electricity consumption drops sharply during the night - when wind power typically peaks. There are power companies that offer substantially cheaper rates at night for charging EVs for this very reason.