South Korea’s military has been forced to remove over 1,300 surveillance cameras from its bases after learning that they could be used to transmit signals to China, South Korean news agency Yonhap reported.

The cameras, which were supplied by a South Korean company, “were found to be designed to be able to transmit recorded footage externally by connecting to a specific Chinese server,” the outlet reported an unnamed military official as saying.

Korean intelligence agencies discovered the cameras’ Chinese origins in July during an examination of military equipment, the outlet said.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Don’t all cheap IP cameras feed back to at least one server in China?

    I bought two different no-name brands from Amazon several years back, and both models of them were trying to call home. I ran them on an isolated network, so they couldn’t get anywhere, but they were persistent little buggers. Oh, and the root password to one of them was hardcoded to “1234567” lol

    Tangent, but if anyone can recommend a good IP camera that just craps out an RTSP stream locally and doesn’t phone home anywhere, DM me lol.

    • oldfart@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m really surprised that military in such a technologically advanced country just connected random IP cams to the internet

    • dezmd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ubiquiti G3 and G4 cams do rtsp direct streams without needing Unifi Protect services on a unifi gateway device. G5 requires unifi prot but can rtsp from the protec gateway.

    • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      Reolink, amcrest. Amcrest dont get anything starting with ASH in the model name.

      If you want ONVIF, be sure to check the specs, many cheaper models drop support, but not all.

      Some YI cameras have easily replaced firmware and can do rtsp too, but you have to do your homework on those models to be sure you’re getting one that can be modded.

      You’ll still want to (IMO) toss any of them in a vlan without internet access, and rather than provide that vlan access to an NVR on another vlan, I’d lean toward your NVR having a second connection to that vlan. I’m a huge fan of segmentation though, so YMMV.

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I can vouch for reolink, they have fairly straight forward nvr with decent cameras for the money. Been using their poe nvr system for around 5 years now and have never had an issue with it.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yeah, that was my old setup: dedicated VLAN with the NVR and cameras in it. Had a firewall rule so I could access the NVR from regular LAN but nothing “got out” of the camera VLAN without being requested from the LAN first.

        At first I had the NVR in the LAN with FW rules to reach the cameras in their VLAN, but my FW at the time struggled with all the simultaneous streams going through it so I moved the NVR in with the cams.

        Maybe I’ll just stick with my current setup of just getting old analog camera housings and sticking Raspberry Pi + camera module inside lol

        • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Dual nic NVR then? You could even just throw a simple switch with no uplink (but preferably managed so you can tag the traffic) and for extra safety just allow only the LAN traffic you want on the NIC/Port connected to your regular LAN from the NVR.

          Nothing wrong with a DIY can though! As long as it works of course

          • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            “NVR” in my case is just Zoneminder lol. I run it on a dedicated USFF PC and didn’t want to deal with multi-homing it or a USB ethernet adapter. When I upgrade it, yeah, I’ll probably get something with a dual NIC and go that route.

            Right now, yeah, it’s all DIY since I scrapped those cameras years ago (neither held up well to UV after 6-7 months outdoors), so I’m less concerned about it with all of them being RPis now. The only thing I lack is PoE since I didn’t want to spring for the HATs.

            • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah all of my servers are on usff PC’s, so I get it.

              If you do a hypervisor like proxmox, then throw your NVR in a VM, you can just create a couple of virtual NICs (though you’ll be back at that FW issue I’m sure).

              USB NICs are pretty well supported these days though, and cheap to boot. Just need to be certain you’ve got usb3 if you want to make use of that gig though!

              I’ve got a few pi-a-likes that I’m doing similar camera fun with, though using some webcams in there and a 3d printed case. At least that way they match my diy temp sensors with esp32s!

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Same with russian ‘grandma phones’ with big buttons. Some researches found thst although they don’t provide any functionality besides basic phone\sms stuff, they do try to call their motherbase, sending all credentials and geoloc. IIRC there was no argument about them sending the content of smses and voicecalls, but it’s troubling as it is.

      + Russian as in sold there, they are chinese, sometimes with a local branding.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not a plug and play solution. But if you aren’t averse to tinkering. RPI zero with a CSI camera and v4lrtsp server. can get you done rather cheap. Depending on your needs.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s actually my current setup :)

        Got some old analog cameras at an estate sale, gutted them, and put some Pi + camera modules inside. Couldn’t get the original optics to work with it, and they lack PoE, but they’re otherwise doing well (3 years and going). Just occasionally have to reboot them more than I’d like.

        Haven’t messed with v4lrtsp server, but zoneminder has been good to me. Will check that out.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes you don’t get things like Poe Etc. At least not on the zero models. There are hats for the full size pi. But you have full control and they are upgradable. I have a zero w in the official enclosure. Double-sided tape to a wall with a micro b cord plugged into power it. Can access the stream over Wi-Fi and get 30 frames per second 720P easy. Could easily do much better than that even. But the original Raspberry Pi camera module I think is the limitation. Because the cores on the Zero are barely being touched at all. In the low double digits if that.

          It’s so light on resources that if someone had an old USB hub. And some old web cameras laying around. You could run multiple cameras off of a single Raspberry Pi zero. I think you would hit Port bandwidth saturation before you would hit a CPU limit. Unless of course you’re trying to reincode.