Wyll is Baldur’s Gate 3’s most boring companion, but he’s a necessary force for good in these games.

  • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What a weird article.

    They have varied characters because different people like different things. “Characters you don’t enjoy” aren’t and shouldn’t be a design goal. That’s idiotic.

    • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They have varied characters because different people like different things.

      That’s what the writer is saying, though? She’s saying it’s good for games to have characters some people consider “bad,” because what’s “bad” Is different for everyone. It means a game has a well-rounded cast of characters.

      • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, it’s not even close.

        He’s claiming being “bad” has inherent value. It’s a terrible, incoherent article presenting an absurdly stupid opinion.

        • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Bad” does have inherent value because one person’s “bad” Is another person’s “awesome.”

          I think Gale is “bad” as she’s defining it because he’s boring and his squishy ass kept getting curb-stomped when I tried to use him. I also hate the way he tries to romance you and the incel vibes I got of him. But go on tumblr and folks just adore him and his romance. What makes him “bad” to me is a selling point to others. That’s what I think the writer is trying to say.