Dude has like 45k subs on YouTube. Fucking weird.

    • Jesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      2 months ago

      His charges were reduced because his lawyers were able to make the case that he was schizophrenic.

      Pleading insanity became much harder in the US after that Hinckley’s case. The ruling was hotly debated.

      • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 months ago

        He tried to kill the active President, not for political reasons, but to impress an actress who didn’t know he existed.

        Mans bat shit. Why on earth would the diagnosis of crazy be challenged?

        • athairmor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          2 months ago

          President was a Republican. They all felt threatened and got scared as they do. Like when that same Republican banned assault rifles after black people started carrying them openly.

        • Jesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          I was just a kid at the time and I was more concerned with whether or not my Gizmo plushy would turn into a gremlin at night.

          That said, the public was pretty pissed at this court’s ruling. Why? I was too young to really comprehend it, but it was definitely a thing that dominated the news.

        • Hikermick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not an expert but from how I understand it that alone doesn’t qualify him to plead insanity. An insane person will act as if they are unaware of what they are doing is wrong.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      2 months ago

      Good. We imagine how our society would have less issues if we focused more on real rehabilitation and reintegration, and less on retribution and *heaping on more trauma.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        For most crimes I agree.

        For murderers, pedophiles, rapists, drunk drivers, snd repeat assaulters I think it should be more about “we’re not reintegrating you back into society…at all. We’re just going to put you into a room and make it so you’re not a threat to society anymore”

        And considering his was against the president, I’m surprised secret service didn’t shoot him dead on the spot.

    • Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s technically possible to do that after committing any crime, but under super specific circumstances and it’s a far cry from a “get out of jail free” card.

      If you’re legitimately, actually insane when you commit a crime you’ll get sent to a mental hospital instead of prison. The catch is that the hospital will only release you if you’re mentally healthy. That can mean that a person who uses the insanity plea may spend more time in the hospital than they would have in prison.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      This guy shot Reagan to make a celebrity he’s been secretly stalking impressed. You think this is the same man?