People’s sex lives are already regulated. And some part of the regulation may be good. This is not a gay sex = bad kind of regulation. I feel like you are not engaging in good faith by blocking any and all conversation.
You were asked "why do you want to police people’s sex lives, you said “I don’t”, and every time you respond you’re talking about how you want it done.
I don’t think it should have been legal for that priest to rape me, probably we agree on that. I am in favor of policing people’s sex lives, obviously far less than you, but I can own it.
I don’t want them policed, I want the step kink to be less pushed and a more representative and inclusive porn industry.
That’s not policing their sex lives as they can still opt in. That’s what annoys me about your phrasing. That phrasing sounds like you are accusing me of being in favor of banning gay sex. This is what policing sex lives has historically been.
People’s sex lives are already regulated. And some part of the regulation may be good. This is not a gay sex = bad kind of regulation. I feel like you are not engaging in good faith by blocking any and all conversation.
You were asked "why do you want to police people’s sex lives, you said “I don’t”, and every time you respond you’re talking about how you want it done.
I don’t think it should have been legal for that priest to rape me, probably we agree on that. I am in favor of policing people’s sex lives, obviously far less than you, but I can own it.
I don’t want them policed, I want the step kink to be less pushed and a more representative and inclusive porn industry.
That’s not policing their sex lives as they can still opt in. That’s what annoys me about your phrasing. That phrasing sounds like you are accusing me of being in favor of banning gay sex. This is what policing sex lives has historically been.