rhabarba@feddit.org to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 16 days agoRust in Linux lead retires rather than deal with more “nontechnical nonsense”arstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square101fedilinkarrow-up1247file-text
arrow-up1247external-linkRust in Linux lead retires rather than deal with more “nontechnical nonsense”arstechnica.comrhabarba@feddit.org to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 16 days agomessage-square101fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarekautau@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·16 days agoIronically the majority of the rust memory management ruleset is called ownership, and they are unwilling to release any of it, and claiming all of it, so there’s an out of memory error.
minus-squareNibodhika@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·16 days agoI didn’t understood your criticism, what are they unwilling to release? What are they claiming all of? Why would ownership rules cause an OOM? Sharing stack memory is a bad practice in C as well btw.
Ironically the majority of the rust memory management ruleset is called ownership, and they are unwilling to release any of it, and claiming all of it, so there’s an out of memory error.
I didn’t understood your criticism, what are they unwilling to release? What are they claiming all of? Why would ownership rules cause an OOM?
Sharing stack memory is a bad practice in C as well btw.