• bumpusoot [any]@hexbear.netEnglish
    1·
    3 months ago

    I don’t really understand the issue people have with this. Sure it doesn’t look like a particularly playable or fun game currently, but I do think it’s an interesting PoC that explores different uses for current “AI”. It’s an idea people may likely build on.

    • NuraShiny [any]@hexbear.netEnglish
      0·
      3 months ago

      Let me tell you some of them:

      • Energy use
      • Lack of game state past 3 seconds (the number the paper cites)
      • Energy use
      • The impossibility of implementing game state past 3 seconds without investing oodles of hours of coding work.
      • Energy use
      • bumpusoot [any]@hexbear.netEnglish
        1·
        2 months ago

        I didn’t say it was a good game, I literally said it was an interesting PoC.

        I understand the energy use objection though, how much energy did this use?