Alt text: mod going MAD WITH POWER by inserting “rule” in the title of a post lacking it

(this is sarcasm, in case that wasn’t abundantly clear)

  • glizzyguzzler@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 months ago

    Adding rule to a title isn’t even a rule, reading the other limits they askplease put rule in your title”, it’s just nice if you did but don’t let yourself be forced to do shit for decorum’s sake! that’s how babies were put up for adoption against the young single mother’s will even if the family could easily support them

    it’s literally the same thing I am sure of it don’t let the propriety committee win

    • BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      2 months ago

      Exactly. It’s a slippery slope. First they force you to put “rule” in the title, then they take your children away. 50 years from now, historians will point to this post as the moment society began to unravel.

      • Vaquedoso@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s always the classic not-rule to take-away-your-children slippery slope, they always warned us of that in school

  • comma@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    heyyyyyyyy, it’s me!!! that’s my post! :D

    i cant believe these guys!!!

    (To be clear, i put the “(rule)” there afterwards :> )

  • Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Oh shit it me

    I hadnt checked the community info in a while lol

    But seriously its a dumb rule. The only rule this community should have is The Rule