A Florida man is facing 20 counts of obscenity for allegedly creating and distributing AI-generated child pornography, highlighting the danger and ubiquity of generative AI being used for nefarious reasons.

Phillip Michael McCorkle was arrested last week while he was working at a movie theater in Vero Beach, Florida, according to TV station CBS 12 News. A crew from the TV station captured the arrest, which made for dramatic video footage due to law enforcement leading away the uniform-wearing McCorkle from the theater in handcuffs.

  • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you want to keep people who fantasise about sexually exploiting children around your family, be my guest. My family tried that, and I was raped. I didn’t like that, and I have drawn my own conclusions.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      yeah and if you want to keep people who fantasize about murdering folk. you can’t say one thing is a thing without saying the other is. Im sorry you were raped but I doubt it would be stopped by banning lolita.

      • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I don’t recall Nabokov’s novel Lolita saying that sexualising minors was an acceptable act.

        Thanks for the strawman, though, I’ll save it to burn in the colder months.

        • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          You can call it a strawman but doing something evil if its killing folks or raping folks the effect should be the same when discussing non actual and actual. You can say this thing is a special case but when it comes to freedom of speech, which is anything that is not based in actual events. writing, speaking, thinking, art. Special circumstances becomes a real slippery slope (which can also be brought up as a fallacy which like all “fallacies” depend a lot on what else backs them up on how they are being presented)