Nowhere did I say people should have the right to “butcher” others.
No, experienced people having authority over inexperienced is not anti-anarchy, unless they always hold authority even in the face of a good idea.
Of course consensus is important in ANY socially-bound system, and the indians were correct. When the majority decide to be fucking morons, it’s time to go. Or worst case, take a nice trek deep into the Paradox of Tolerance and kill the belligerent ring leaders.
Yes, there always has to be some hierarchy… the ENTIRE FUCKING POINT of “anarchy” is that authority has to be JUSTIFIED, preferably at all times. Only stupid children think anarchy literally means zero authority.
You’re only being gaslit successfully because you’re clearly too stupid to pull the obvious axioms out of such an ideology…
Nowhere did I say people should have the right to “butcher” others.
No, experienced people having authority over inexperienced is not anti-anarchy, unless they always hold authority even in the face of a good idea.
Of course consensus is important in ANY socially-bound system, and the indians were correct. When the majority decide to be fucking morons, it’s time to go. Or worst case, take a nice trek deep into the Paradox of Tolerance and kill the belligerent ring leaders.
Yes, there always has to be some hierarchy… the ENTIRE FUCKING POINT of “anarchy” is that authority has to be JUSTIFIED, preferably at all times. Only stupid children think anarchy literally means zero authority.
You’re only being gaslit successfully because you’re clearly too stupid to pull the obvious axioms out of such an ideology…