• hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    6 months ago

    If only there was a way to increase voter turnout, like giving voters what they want… nah, that’d make too much sense. The democrats are too smart to give people what they want.

    • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Democrats do that. They appeal to centrists because those are the people who turn out to vote.

      Leftists don’t get representation, the ratchet turns right. Funny how that works

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        6 months ago

        Or maybe the centrists turn out because they’re the ones that democrats appeal to. Obama ran on a progressive campaign and won big in 2008, so it’s clear that it works. The problem is that he then immediately turned around and instituted centrist policy as usual.

        • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Same thing with Biden. Ran on $10,000 of student debt relief for everyone, improving the climate, and not being Trump. People figured they could push him left, that was the argument. Now he’s been a lot better than I thought he would be admittedly. But still, the student debt relief has been extremely targeted, he made foreign electric cars more expensive, and he’s materially supporting a genocide while yelling at the protests against it. If they can’t push him left in 4 years, then the theory was proven wrong, candidates can’t be pushed left, and it’s right for leftists not to vote for them. Democrats don’t feel they have to move left because leftists have no other choice about who to vote for, so I get the calculus on their parts, but it’s becoming dangerous.

          It also depends on how much supporting a current genocide is a red line for someone. That seems to be the biggest difference I see in these posts. Some people can’t bring themselves to vote for someone who does that no matter what. Others seem to be more malleable and forgiving about it. I know which one I am, but honestly, no judgment on either. I waffle between them myself. I don’t feel nearly as much pressure as others,though, because I don’t live in a swing state, so my vote doesn’t matter.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Obama ran on a progressive campaign and won big in 2008, so it’s clear that it works

          God. It’s fascinating how little self-proclaimed leftists remember 2008.

          • hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            6 months ago

            Which part am I wrong about? Obama ran on affordable healthcare, abortion rights, being anti-bailout for too-big-to-fail entities, and being anti-war. He won a supermajority. Then he scaled back his healthcare plan, said abortion rights “aren’t a top priority”, continued bush’s bailouts and added more, and invaded/bombed more countries during his term.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              Obama passed the best affordable healthcare plan he could.

              On abortion rights, he was no more left than Hillary. On the bailouts, he was openly in support of the Bush bailout plan even before the election. On war, Obama was openly in favor of the continuation of the war in Afghanistan and harder military policy against several countries, some of which even McCain wasn’t onboard on.

              But hey, whatever helps fuel your delusional “If only candidates were more left, then they would DEFINITELY win in a landslide!” outlook.

              • mydude@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                6 months ago

                The democrats are all moderate republicans, which in itself is an oxymoron. Don’t believe me, here is Obama saying just that (about himself); https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJIlZxHfclc Now imagine you somehow get total control of all braches, and to top it off 3 weeks filibuster proof. You can do anything, but you don’t really want change. What do you do? Well implement RomneyCare, call it ObamaCare and leave out the public option, which will ensure it be a giveaway to big pharma. Seems good at first glance, but leaving out the public option really killed it, as they intended.

                Regarding roe…

                The first thing I’ll do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BdrOrwmk78Y

                Im pro choice https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmzdkAbu8dY

                Not my highest priority https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RxiDZejZFjg

                parody… No https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1z4uhxpOnN0

              • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                6 months ago

                Obama had full control of both houses and the White House, they could have passed whatever they wanted.

                Instead we still didn’t get single payer healthcare.

              • shikitohno@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                6 months ago

                Obama was really good at letting people project what they wanted on to him politically, while still broadly holding to the neoliberal agenda, and lots of people were insanely naïve at the time. I mean, you had people who claimed to actually expect the election of Obama to usher in a post-racial epoch in the USA, as though all the racists were going to say, “Aw, shucks, the black guy won? Well, hang it up boys, we have to face reality and accept we’ve been wrong all along.”

                He also benefitted from pretty excellent political cover from criticism, where, like many vocal Biden supporters are doing right now, any criticism of him would be associated with outright support of the vilest opinions espoused by the GOP at the time. If you said “You know, this Obama guy isn’t as great as he’s being made out to be,” you’d have people assuming you were some nutjob that thought he was secretly Kenyan, or whatever other crazy conspiracies the Tea Party folks trotted out. I don’t think it was purely malicious or cynical attempts to discredit people all the time, but there was a big chunk of people who wanted to believe in their conception of Obama, which couldn’t admit that he wasn’t the savior sent from on high to resolve all the country’s problems in exactly the manner they had hoped he would.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Good god. You win elections from the center. A center vote that switches from R to D is worth double because the R loses one vote and D gains one. You literally win from the center.

      If you want the center to move, then make the Dems win overwhelmingly and consistently in President, house of reps, and senators.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        So do you think republicans are catering to centrists with their full dive into fascism or do you think only democrats need to appeal to “centrists” for some reason?

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          Trump won by appealing to the manufacturing jobs sector, and because of the protest Hillary vote. As much as I want to believe people were/are informed about his fascism, they really aren’t.

          And now, because Trump won one election, the whole Overton window moved right. You know, because he won an election. You want to move the Overton window? Vote.

          • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Biden won an election more recently than him. Weird how the Overton window moves when Republicans win an election but not when Democrats do. Wonder if there’s a reason for that.

            Hell, Bernie (and Warren) moved the widow more by running in a primary than they did by winning.

            • someguy3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              The reason is because Dems have to actually do things like pass legislation. Which more often than not requires all 3 of house, senate, and president. All the GOP has to do is block things and yell immigrants. Progress takes, you know, actual work. Stagnation or regression takes next to nothing.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      like giving voters what they want

      Funny enough, giving voters what they want is inevitably decried by Very Serious Online Leftists