• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is a bad idea. Transmitting on a government frequency with enough power to interfere with other radio traffic will get you a police visit. You’re basically turning on a big lightbulb that says “come find me” for anyone who would bother to triangulate the source of the interference.

    • archonet@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      what if you had something like that running in a bag or backpack at a protest, with hundreds or even thousands of people around you? How about if you had three or four people with them coordinating, switching them on and off at certain times as they move through the crowd?

    • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s real hard to find the interferer when there’s interferers everywhere, also triangulation is hard, particularly for a bunch of meat heads who have been shown to struggle with high school education.

      • Carmakazi@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s still a significant escalation of “extralegal” activity on the same level as torching a police cruiser in a parking lot, and isn’t really congruous with the first paragraph in that regard. Probably from ignorance of how serious signal jamming is more than anything.

        It’s like saying to leave your phone at home and know your rights, but also remember that .243 Winchester lead-free ammo can penetrate level IV plates.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s real hard to find the interferer when there’s interferers everywhere

        It’s actually pretty easy to locate a radio source on a particular frequency, especially if it’s a frequency where most transmitters are known/registered (e.g. police radios).

        also triangulation is hard, particularly for a bunch of meat heads who have been shown to struggle with high school education.

        You do realize that not all police are beat cops, right? They have technical specialists. If there’s an issue outside the qualifications of a regular officer, they just refer it to the specialists who know exactly what to do.

        Police have been driving around with suitcase-sized Stingray devices since at least 2006. They absolutely have equipment that can triangulate a radio source - they don’t even really need to understand how it works, just turn it on.

        • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          The problem isn’t one strong stationary interferer, its a large number of weak intermittent interferers.