Substance_P@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 3 months agoCome and take itlemmy.worldimagemessage-square247fedilinkarrow-up11.13K
arrow-up11.13KimageCome and take itlemmy.worldSubstance_P@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square247fedilink
minus-squarecurbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·3 months agoIn the context of the time period, it was a replacement for a standing army. As we have one, then obviously that amendment no longer has any meaning then? So we should just remove it. Cool.
minus-squareTb0n3@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoI’m more for disbanding the standing military than disarming the citizenry.
In the context of the time period, it was a replacement for a standing army.
As we have one, then obviously that amendment no longer has any meaning then? So we should just remove it. Cool.
I’m more for disbanding the standing military than disarming the citizenry.
Why not both?
Removed by mod