cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/18629062

According to the debate, they had their reasons. But still – when one hundred and eighty six nations say one thing, and two say another, you have to wonder about the two.

  • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 months ago

    North Korea’s famine during the 90s was due to western sanctions after everyone they used to buy food from left their economic bloc, not because they don’t believe people should have food.

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      Maybe they should start spending their missile program money on developing their nation’s agriculture rather than relying on food imports.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        What and get invaded by the guys who fly nuclear-capable bombers right along their border and practice invading them every year?

        Last time they got caught lacking, 20% of their population died, many of them burned alive in their apartments by napalm.

        • ahornsirup@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 months ago

          You mean that time when North Korea invaded South Korea? They weren’t “caught lacking” they started the war.

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            The US had been making preparations for war since the late 40s, including dividing the country in the first place and telling the Japanese in the south to stay in place until the US could replace them, massacring villages likely to side with the communists, and getting South Korea recognized as the sole government of all of Korea at the UN.

            War was inevitable, they struck when it looked like they’d have their best shot.

        • Rolder@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          We’re talking about the same North Korea who regularly threatens to nuke their neighbor and has gone as far as shooting a missile over Japan? Something tells me they are the instigators.

            • Rolder@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Even putting aside the puppet state argument, does that suddenly make it okay to threaten innocents with nukes?

              • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                3 months ago

                Of course it doesn’t, that’s why it’s fucked up that the US has flown nuclear-capable planes directly along North Korea’s border most years for the last 40 or so.

                • Rolder@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Hope you realize there’s a big difference between “can carry nukes” and “actually is carrying nukes”. You could drop one from a civilian airliner if you felt so inclined, doesn’t mean civilian planes are a danger to us all.

                  Besides, when the North has a military over twice the size of the south and is constantly saber rattling, it makes sense to keep an eye on the border. Wonder why they are spending so much on their military and not on, you know, their citizens.

                  • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    Hope you realize there’s a big difference between “can carry nukes” and “actually is carrying nukes”.

                    Correct. The missiles were not actually carrying nukes, but they were capable of carrying nukes. North Korea fired missiles that were capable of carrying nukes in response to the US flying bombers capable of carrying nukes along their border to express “If you nuke us, we can at least do some damage”; mutually assured destruction.

                    Besides, when the North has a military over twice the size of the south and is constantly saber rattling

                    The North is not just up against the South, but against the entire US military.

                    Wonder why they are spending so much on their military and not on, you know, their citizens.

                    Because if they didn’t, the US would make an example out of them the way they did Iraq and Afghanistan and Syria and Libya and Yugoslavia.

        • FireTower@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          If that happens they’ll probably have all food imports halted. If they can’t support themselves during peace time they sure can’t in war.

          If Kim would like for people to stop practicing to take down his regime maybe he should be more quiet about attempting to develop ICBMs.

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      And why was North Korea being sanctioned? The dictator didn’t prefer to have his subjects starve (that’s pretty rare for pragmatic reasons, although not unheard of) but he certainly didn’t prioritize feeding them.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        why was North Korea being sanctioned

        Do you want me to explain the entire Korean war to you?

        Here, best I can do is a podcast. It’s very well sourced though

        The dictator didn’t prefer to have his subjects starve

        This was the 90s, North Korea had just watched Russia experience a famine after the west had their way with them. The only thing the US would have accepted to lift sanctions would have been opening up North Korea to be eviscerated the same way the USSR was.

        he certainly didn’t prioritize feeding them.

        Sure, that’s why they stabilized the situation by increasing imports and building massive irrigation projects.

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      And now they eat poop fruit. Starvation sanctions are such monstrous means to an end; people should not have to resort to night soil because your government has beef with theirs.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m not sure how credible that is since any story about NK needs to be taken with a massive grain of salt. They stabilized their food situation in the 2000s so it’s unlikely they’d be eating poo.

      • Rolder@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Never mind the fact that food isn’t part of the sanctions and they are able to freely import it as needed

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        We’ve never actually restricted sale or transfer of food or agricultural products to north Korea. We’ve given them food assistance in the past and only stopped when they requested we do so.

        The sanctions definitely have wide and severe negative consequences, but in general to food impact of sanctions is that cargo inspections and paperwork make it take longer to arrive.