To be clear, the reason why I replied was because of the comment “But you gotta cut corners for humor somewhere.”. To me, that seems to imply that you think that RFK’s androgen replacement therapy is not actually gender affirming care and that the parallel was only drawn in the interest of humor rather than being accurate.
Just because Wikipedia doesn’t say it’s gender affirming care doesn’t mean it isn’t.
That absolutely is a form of gender affirming care.
My comment refers to the Wikipedia article. I do not care if you call a dog a canine or a human an animal. But if you don’t I might note it as odd.
I’m not sure what you mean.
To be clear, the reason why I replied was because of the comment “But you gotta cut corners for humor somewhere.”. To me, that seems to imply that you think that RFK’s androgen replacement therapy is not actually gender affirming care and that the parallel was only drawn in the interest of humor rather than being accurate.
Fair point.