• apotheotic(she/they)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “We need to make sure that we put women in the men’s ward and men in the women’s ward. That will make people feel safer and result in fairer care” fucking transphobe terf island I hate it here

    • Struggleandgrunt@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Incorrect, they are single sex wards not single gender wards. Females should be on a Female ward and Males on a Male ward which is correct if wards are decided based on sex and not gender.

      • apotheotic(she/they)@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        “I’m going to reply to the trans person under the premise that they don’t understand sex and gender”

        The sentiment of my comment was a lot deeper than “conflating sex and gender”. The subtext was that single-sex wards where you are sorted by your AGAB are not trans (or intersex) inclusive, even if technically valid sorting criteria.

        • Struggleandgrunt@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          transgender people, whose gender identity differs from their biological sex, may be provided single rooms, where appropriate

          • apotheotic(she/they)@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            So you consider “putting those weird other people in their own rooms away from the rest of us normals” to be inclusive? Its 1 step better than forcing them to be in a room full of people of the opposite gender, sure, but it sure as hell isn’t inclusive. Anyway, this conversation is over a week stale, I don’t care for it anymore. Have a nice life!

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        That seems reasonable. I’m a transsexual female with female hormones and female genitalia, I was AMAB and I will be in the female ward along with my fellow females, thanks!

        • Struggleandgrunt@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You are not assigned male, you fall in the sex category male at birth. Sex is immutable and cannot be changed unlike gender, therefore in wards based on sex you will be put in a male ward. Unless as the article lays out you get your own room, which is the likely and most preferred outcome for all inpatients.

          • apotheotic(she/they)@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            If you knew as much as you try to put on about biological sex, you’d know that’s its far, far more complicated than “male or female” and there are plenty of people who are assigned one thing at birth which doesn’t factually align with their biological sex. So yes, it is an assignment.

            I fail to see how a rational inpatient would give the slightest fuck if the girl a bed over from them had a removed when they were born so i dont know what preferred outcome they have in this, and I can speak as a trans person to the fact that it would not be my preferred outcome to be singled out and put in my own room. I’d choose it over being in the male ward, but its not my “preferred outcome”.

          • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            What world do you live in where spare rooms on the NHS are widely available? Because I’d like to go there, since it certainly isn’t reality.

            You are not assigned male, you fall in the sex category male at birth

            I’m not at birth though anymore am I? I’m not a man and for most purposes I’m not male anymore either. Defining sex by chromosomes only when dictating societal policy which is very much not about chromosomes when it comes to sex segregation is overly reductive and it is completely absurd to place women who transitioned decades ago and have very little physically in common with the male sex alongside the male sex for literally no reason.

            The only motivation for this absurdity is to hurt and ostracize trans people.

            You

            My NHS sex marker says F and has since I’ve had an NHS number and I never even changed my name from a very obviously male one. It’s almost as if this whole charade is pretty absurd and trans women being women and for the most part female is self-evident.

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    How is this not common sense? It’s a matter of woman’s safety, like avoiding a repeat of Isla Bryson

    transgender people, whose gender identity differs from their biological sex, may be provided single rooms, where appropriate

    Fair enough

    • adderaline@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      so should we segregate our hospitals too? i’m sure you could find some examples of interracial violence if you cared to look. maybe the poor people should get their own ward, we all know the poors are more likely to be criminals! the argument you’re using right now is one that has been used against minority groups since antiquity. all people are capable of violence. that you focus only on the violence of a single case, and use that to justify discrimination? that is not “common sense”. it is prejudice.