• knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Some queer folk would have preferred to reclaim it for ourselves like we did with “queer”, but “removed” and “fascism” share the same linguistic root and the single degree of dissociation is a bit too uncomfy for most.

    • AnIndefiniteArticle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Back when I was growing up 15 years ago, “removedwas reclaimed. I still have trouble processing it as a slur. I don’t know how it fell back into being a slur and became denormalized.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Wasn’t that just Louis CK trying to do a bit? And nobody listened because it’s not up to a straight man to reclaim the word.

      • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m so confused. Did you guys all just start using “removed” as a euphemism?

          • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes, I get that from context. I just don’t understand why they are all using the same way of censoring themselves. It looks like a censor slapped that on

            • clickyello@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              probably the same mod who removed the top comment censored them, idk if they have that ability but I assume so. I know .ml censors a lot of stuff automatically and it looks exactly like that.

              • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Not a thing as far as I’m aware. Maybe admins but I’m fairly sure they cannot