• bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    They did a bunch of them near where I used to live. The problem with these (and really all unplanned high density housing) is that while their intent is to create walkable communities (a great idea in itself), they ignore the reality that most people are going to commute to a job, and they create the nastiest traffic bottlenecks ever. They’re not bad when they’re located next to a major highway with preplanned egress/ingress, but many of these halfwit developers will plop them with an entrance exit on an already busy 4 lane road and wonder why everything is all wacko.

    • regul@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      If traffic gets bad enough people will make different decisions.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      My neighborhood has been pretty long standing in its current state. This is part of a hugely explosive new wave of gentrification. I’m seeing it happen before my eyes. It’s pretty sad.

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Indeed. I will say that we certainly need to rethink the way we go about planning and engineering our cities in a way that removes the necessity for cars as a primary means of transportation, but these designs need to come from a higher collective level within local governments that allows for a more intertwined planning and management. As of now, you have individual developers doing whatever they think is best (aka most profitable) and it tells these subpar effects.