The Biden administration last week put a hold on a shipment of U.S.-made ammunition to Israel, two Israeli officials told Axios.

Why it matters: It is the first time since the Oct. 7 attack that the U.S. has stopped a weapons shipment intended for the Israeli military. The incident raised serious concerns inside the Israeli government and sent officials scrambling to understand why the shipment was held, Israeli officials said. President Biden is facing sharp criticism among Americans who oppose his support of Israel. The administration in February asked Israel to provide assurances that U.S.-made weapons were being used by Israel Defense Forces in Gaza in accordance with international law. Israel provided a signed letter of assurances in March.

  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It was initially for defense after a massacre when the Iron Dome was breached in October. That was completely justified support. The munitions sold since Netanyahu began indiscriminately killing Palestinians are not.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Agreed. It’s been the standard since Israel was conceived in 1948, but there are a lot more liberal people in Israel now. The ultra-orthodox make up only 13% now, and those are the conservatives that got Netanyahu into power. He only has a 15% approval rating since January, and there have been massive protests since March. Let’s hope they do the right thing with the next election and allow Palestinians access to their holy land.

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            That sounds like ignorant nationalism. I have Israeli-American friends that describe the party very differently. I may believe you if you could substantiate it with proof of their fascist left wing.

            • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              The very fact that their “left” still wants an apartheid state! There’s no Israeli left party that wants to give equal rights to Palestinians and return their homes.

                • Count042@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  The trick here, that was even covered in that paper, is the difference between what Palestinians think a one state solution is and what Israelis think a one state solution is.

                  In that study they found the Palestinians viewed a single country with equal rights for all as a one state solution. The Israelis thought it meant a state with all of the territory but without the Palestinians.

                  Frankly, the liberal Israelis wouldn’t be for a one state solution if it also meant giving up the land and property stolen from the Palestinians through terrorism.

                  “Scratch a liberal, and a fascist bleeds”

                  Watch how fast they’d turn right wing if property in west Jerusalem or east Jerusalem had to be given up.

                  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Where do you see the point about Israelis believing it would be without Palestinians? I’ve read it twice now, and I don’t see that understanding anywhere. Did you make that up?

    • NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is the equivalent of someone taking your house and throwing you in the basement and then when you come out and attack decades later they fight back and say its for self defense. Please.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        So Native Americans should just start murdering Americans until they leave? One state is the only equitable solution at this point.

        • NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago
          1. I’m not against a one state solution
          2. Stolen land/property should be given back
          3. Your example is disanalgous, run the clock back to when the colonies were being formed. If a colonist from Europe came and took their house or the land they use or live on they have every right to fight back.
          4. If a colonist attacks me and kills my family I have a right to fight back. If I fight back then its not self defense for them but for me.
          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            You’re right. It’s an imperfect analogy. The Jews that occupy Israel once lived in Israel. Colonialists never originated in America. If you want to run the clock back, take a real look at who is responsible for the creation of Israel.

            The Jews didn’t have the means to fight anyone, having just been displaced from their homes in Germany and Poland. Truman and the UN, against Great Britain’s protest, provided the necessary forces as an investment against the colonial presence of Great Britain and socialist presence of the USSR in the form of Arab/Palestinian support. The US is more to blame for the creation and existence of the state of Israel than the Israelis.

            https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1047&context=history_etds

            • Count042@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              The Zionist terrorist organizations that ethnically cleansed portions of Mandatory Palestine through murder sprees of civilians are responsible

              Stop posting the thesis of a dude going for his masters degree in history at ‘Old Dominion’ university written in 1980 as a source when this was recent enough that we literally have primary sources for what happened.

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          No one in Israel wants that.

          Also, this comparison is very apt. Israelis explicitly want to get to the point where they have the land and can just give land acknowledgments. This view though is dependent on "Never Again’’ meaning nothing.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The previous attacks during the Biden administration were attempted attacks on Hamas, not attacks directed at Palestinians. If Israel always wanted to kill all Palestinians, that would’ve been done in 1985 when this conflict started. Netanyahu has been using the attack on Oct. 7 to justify the shift in tactics from targeting Hamas to “we can’t tell them apart.”

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago
          1. No, all the children shot during the March of Return were not Hamas, nor were the thousands killed before 2006.

          2. Palestinians have a right to resist. Israel, being an illegitimate settler apartheid state, has no such right. Attacks on Hamas are not justified.

              • rusticus@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                You say in a thread where the current president has delayed weapons delivery for the first time in 50 years. STFU

                • Sunforged@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  It’s not because he personally wants to, go check what he’s on the record as saying his entire career. This isn’t something to applaud, this is him trying to avoid political blowback. You think we should stop applying pressure because of a single descision?

                  • _tezz@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    The other commenter didn’t say that, but also, shouldn’t we be pleased that a politician, the literal President of the United States, is buckling to public pressure here? Isn’t that the whole point of democracy is that they are supposed to represent the will of the people? That he is doing this in spite of his own personal interest is pretty amazing and stark compared to Trump.

                    I think we should take wins like this seriously, the system is working as it should for a brief moment here. Progress takes time, let’s celebrate how quickly an 81 year old man is changing course on something lol