The Biden administration last week put a hold on a shipment of U.S.-made ammunition to Israel, two Israeli officials told Axios.

Why it matters: It is the first time since the Oct. 7 attack that the U.S. has stopped a weapons shipment intended for the Israeli military. The incident raised serious concerns inside the Israeli government and sent officials scrambling to understand why the shipment was held, Israeli officials said. President Biden is facing sharp criticism among Americans who oppose his support of Israel. The administration in February asked Israel to provide assurances that U.S.-made weapons were being used by Israel Defense Forces in Gaza in accordance with international law. Israel provided a signed letter of assurances in March.

  • 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Great, now stop all money and weapons to Israel entirely. Every day Biden doesn’t do this we get closer to a criminal orange man as president.

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      But what about the profits? You can’t go around not profiting just because a few thousand children are being killed, disfigured and orphaned! It’s like you don’t understand neoliberalism at all.

      Sarcasm aside, stopping the money and weapons isn’t enough to stop the genocide because Israel never needed any of it in the first place. But if you funnel hundreds of billions of dollars to defence contractors, there’s nothing the US government won’t consent to.

      Orange man won’t be any different. He’s not even trying to pretend it’s not a genocide, just coming out and saying Israel should “finish the problem”.

      • 3volver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        stopping the money and weapons isn’t enough to stop the genocide

        “This thing isn’t good because it doesn’t do the thing all the way, so the thing isn’t worthwhile”.

        Have a nice day political agitator, now get blocked.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      While I’d love to see that, it would be unprecedented in the history of US-Israel relations. If it does happen at all, it will definitely come slowly.

      Also, you may want to stop putting election abstinence out there as a consequence. We’re all aware that Trump will make things worse for Palestinians as well as everyone who isn’t a rich white American industrialist male.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        it would be unprecedented in the history of US-Israel relations

        Not unprecedented. Ronald Reagan used the threat of halting arms exports to Israel in '83, in order to end PM Menachem Begin’s terror bombing of Beirut.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yes. He then sold arms to Iran, known as the Iran-Contra scandal, which in turn went to Hezbollah, inciting the Israel-Iran proxy war we’re protesting today. Then he provided military aid to Israel under agreement that they use it to attack Hezbollah in Lebanon. He literally is the father of this proxy conflict. Do not glorify his actions.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            How is this the response to a post directly pointing out what you said is wrong.

            “Yes I was wrong, but he was horrible so it doesn’t count.”

            Ronald Reagan was a piece of shit. He also did the thing you said no one had done before.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              No, again, he didn’t. He only withheld aid in order to direct the use of the subsequent military aid. That’s not being “tough on Israel.” It’s telling them where to shoot.

              • Count042@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                No, he didn’t. The saturation bombing of Beirut was a step too far, especially as it was fucking with the US’s attempts to broker peace in Lebanon. It also actually pissed Reagan off who described it in the phone call as ‘a holocaust’

                You have the weirdest, most demented, view of American history as it relates to Israel I think I’ve ever seen.