• AsakuraMao@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    Articles like this are just trying to amp up the idiotic “but muh both sides” argument.

    One of the candidates wants to turn America into a dictatorshop, the other one doesn’t.

    • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s already a fascist dictatorship, it has been. We have a dictatorship of capital where both right wing parties answer to the same bankers, CEOs, and the donor class. They are the ones directing policy, not us.

  • thefluffiest@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    If one is so generous as to call the US a democracy still. It’s more like an oligarchy, if not a kleptocracy.

  • A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    this animated cartoon “The Simpsons” is sometimes quite prophetic. Here, with this episode where they have to choose between two bad extraterrestrial candidates …

    • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      And when somebody suggests voting third-party, they’re told: “Go ahead. Throw your vote away!”

      As a result, the humans all end up enslaved because they didn’t want to vote third-party.

      • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Voting third party being a waste isn’t someone’s opinion. It’s actual math. 3rd party candidates stand 0 chance in this system. I’d love them to. I believe the last (and possibly only) 3rd party to stand a chance was Teddy Rosevelt with the Bull Moose/ Progressive Party. That was 112 years ago. They merged with the Republicans in less than a decade.

        Basically, voting 3rd party in this system is, in fact, throwing away your vote.

        If you really want to try and change things, I’d focus on boosting up people in the Democratic Party that are pushing for election reforms, because theres no other way that a 3rd party will ever win

        • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Basically, voting 3rd party in this system is, in fact, throwing away your vote.

          If my preferred party gets more votes this year than they did four years ago, that is a good outcome. Gradually increasing the third-party turnout year over year is how we will chip away at the two-party system.

          And if my vote helps my preferred party increase their vote, that is a good use of my vote.

          • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I understand completely, believe me. I’ve done plenty of work for my local Socialist Party branch. I play board games with the local candidate on a regular basis.

            I’m still not voting for him for anything. He isn’t voting for himself either. We both know he has 0 chance of winning, partly because he has socialist next to his name, but primarily because he’s a 3rd party that struggles to even get on the local ballots. We still raise awareness and spread our causes, but we live in a state that’s outlawed anything other than first past the post, and we’re both smart enough to know that, mathematically, he stands zero chance.

            • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Well, that’s up to you. But keep organizing. Maybe your local Socialist Party branch will one day have enough members that you feel comfortable voting for them.

              • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                I hope so, but I doubt it’ll happen in my life time. This is a deeply conservative area. It’ll take a culture shift like the world has never seen before

      • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        And Homer gloats “Don’t blame me, I voted for Kodos”, not realizing that voting for Kodos instead of Kang makes no difference.

  • recapitated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    There is no democracy until we have ranked choice. Right now it’s two sides having to place a god damn bet every election cycle instead of finding common ground which definitely exists.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    With less than four months to go, America’s presidential race, global democracy’s showpiece event, has boiled down to a choice between a crook, a codger, a cheerleader and a charlatan.

    The word, by definition, denotes a personality characterised by impaired empathy and remorse, narcissism, superficial charm, manipulativeness, dishonesty and an outward appearance of normality.

    Yet now, unbelievably, this sleazy liar, convicted felon and wannabe dictator, this serial sexual abuser, faux-Christian and closet racist reckons he holds the moral high ground.

    Names like California’s Gavin Newsom, Michigan’s Gretchen Whitmer and former transport secretary Pete Buttigieg are tossed around like racecourse betting tickets.

    Intriguingly, the same fate could befall Trump one day, given his telling choice of the unpleasantly hard-right, white nationalist-populist senator JD Vance as running mate.

    Vance’s extremist, intolerant views on abortion, immigration, isolationism and protectionism, plus his inflammatory, divisive rhetoric, typify America’s hugely self-destructive 2024 election.


    The original article contains 951 words, the summary contains 143 words. Saved 85%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!