• FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          God yes. I absolutely HATE that phones got slimmer and slimmer while also consuming more battery - which can’t be swapped like the good old days.

          I’ve got giant hands. Give me a phone that’s AT LEAST twice as thick with a battery that lasts at least three days.

          I’d absolutely carry a large Motorola brick phone style if those were still viable today. They do make retro gimmick phones like it, but you really do need a smartphone for a lot of specific apps.

          • TotalSonic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Unihertz and Oukitel both make “rugged” phone models with giant batteries - aimed at weekend campers with giant hands. And Fairphone and Volla both have phones that still allow for easy battery swapping.

            • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Neat, I’ve never heard of those. Unihertz makes one with a projector in it… that’s wild. I’d be hesitant to buy a phone that’s sold on AliExpress though, I’d assume OS support wouldn’t be that great.

              • TotalSonic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Yeah, software support tends to be pretty bad for their devices, with few updates, and they are often bad with posting kernel source for their devices, so hard to get custom roms or flash alternative OS’s on them too. But if you want a phone that has a battery that can last 3 days straight - they are indeed available for purchase

      • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        If battery technology werenʼt still stuck in the Vietnam War era, 2-second rapid charging would require something like a thick boi USB-B cable to satisfy everyoneʼs desire to also use their phone as a tazer/hand grenade/flying drone/cardiac defibrillator/space heater.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve had 400% more failures of USB C than of micro. Keep in mind I’ve only had C for a couple years, and micro for 14 across numerous devices.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That’s got to be something you’re doing. Cause I’ve had exactly zero problems. In fact I don’t think I’ve actually met a person who’s ever had a problem with USB - C. But I have boxes (plural) of dead micro USB cables and, on top of that, I have so many devices that have been rendered useless by the fact that the micro USB port has been blown or damaged in some way it’s not even funny.

        Edit, these are not all mine. They are from multiple people.

        • SirSnufflelump@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m with you. Those spring-latch-things on the micro just give up on life and the whole thing becomes useless or tears apart the port you try to plug them into. I say leave them in the past

          • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah, I love the counter argument of “oh, the USB - C gets dirt in it”. As though that hasn’t been an issue with every port ever conceived. 😒

            • tyler@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Was a lot less of an issue with lightning than with other connectors, but I realize that people hate the lightning for some reason.

                • SirSnufflelump@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  And because of the little metal piece that would break off and prevent your phone from charging. You could just weasel it out with tweezers but most people would think their port was broken because they didn’t know it was even an issue.

        • shottymcb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Type-C ports are a lot more sensitive to dirt in my experience. I can keep it working if I clean the port every couple weeks, but at this point I just pretend phones don’t have charging ports.

      • Storspoven@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Me too, first two phones I had with USB C both developed issues with the port, one shorted in the port, the other for some reason could only be charged with one specific cable, oriented in only one direction. Never had any issues with the ports on any previous USB micro phones.

        The current one works alright though, and its capable of detecting water and dirt in the port, so probably won’t short itself. So I think the technology is improving.

        • lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          In my experience, that’s what tends to happen with a dirty port/cable. Cleaning it out solves the problem 99% of the time.

        • ruckblack@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          My anecdotal experience is the complete opposite of you two lol. Tons of issues with micro-b and a few broken connectors. No issues thus far with C.