• Magnetar@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The whole “purebred” thing always seems weird to me, “purebred” royal families aren’t pretty but full of genetic defects, why should it be an better with cats or dogs.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nearly every cat I ever had was once a stray and I wouldn’t trade that for the world.

        • teuast@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was at cat lounge/rescue/adoption place in my area recently (not to adopt, just to pet the cats) and one of the cats, a maybe ~7mo female tabby with a slightly fucked up ear named Maggie, after spending most of the time I was there hiding in a corner, decided she liked me, came up to me, sat down on my lap, and refused to budge. One of the staff members came up to say “hey man you’re at your time limit, but I can see you’re in a situation here so just… whenever is chill”

    • credit crazy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Perchance these competitions should have a points deducted by the animals quality of life. Of the poor thing has a hard time breathing -10 points idk

    • Rolder@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hmm two possible reasons come to mind. First, purebred in terms of cats and dogs not necessarily meaning genetic defects. Second, having a defined breed gives the judges something to rate against.

      • Pringles@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not necessarily? More like by default. Purebreds are a thing because of certain genetic traits and are bred to not only maintain them, but to enhance those traits. Because of all that inbreeding the propensity for certain diseases and cancers are vastly increased. A purebred dog or cat will with near certainty be riddled with cancer or disease by the time they start getting a bit older. I love both cats and dogs, but purebreds shouldn’t be a thing.

        • oatscoop@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s the size of the population and the competence/goals of the breeders. Breeders chasing exaggerated traits at the expense of the animal’s health are the major problem.

          There are “pure” breeds of every domestic animal that are healthy – provided it’s a line not perpetuated by selfish idiots. Domestic shorthair cats, various working breeds of dogs, horses, etc.

          • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I like how you put “pure” in quotes because the way they keep those lines healthy is by occasionally mixing in other breeds.

      • SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I once was looking to get a cat and found the goofiest looking idiot on Craigslist. Turns out, it was a purebred Exotic Shorthair that was surrendered to a shelter because it didn’t look fucked-up enough (it could still kind of breathe through its nose). New owners wanted to recoup costs because they adopted another cat that was “more playful” and the exotic was getting eye-goop on their white carpets. A wonderful standard for purebreeds!

        I changed his name from “Luigi” to “Waluigi”, and he was best best buddy for many many years.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    We could just have that. A contest where you bring your cat, they get to play around for an afternoon, and the only outcome from the judge is “yep, that’s a cat”.