BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 months agoAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square270fedilinkarrow-up1392
arrow-up1392imageAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square270fedilink
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 months ago This fact has nothing to do with the philosophy of consenting to exist If living organisms are predisposed to prefer existence, this would imply existence is an inherently preferable state. Something that does not exist cannot desire. Prove it
minus-squareretrieval4558@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·4 months ago If living organisms are predisposed to prefer existence, this would imply existence is an inherently preferable state. It usually is- to a living organism, which is not what we’re talking about. Prove it Come on bro you can’t be serious about this.
If living organisms are predisposed to prefer existence, this would imply existence is an inherently preferable state.
Prove it
It usually is- to a living organism, which is not what we’re talking about.
Come on bro you can’t be serious about this.