Destide@feddit.uk to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoInfallible Codelemmy.mlimagemessage-square154linkfedilinkarrow-up1485
arrow-up1485imageInfallible Codelemmy.mlDestide@feddit.uk to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square154linkfedilink
minus-squareFishFace@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI don’t want unseeded randomness in my tests, ever. Seed the tests, and making these pass would be trivial.
minus-squareFrederikNJS@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThe right tool for the right job ¯\(ツ)/¯
minus-squareFishFace@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThe right tool here is tests at a level higher than machine code instructions that have been in CPUs since the 70s. Maybe TDD practice is not to test at this level, but every example of TDD sure tends to be something similar!
I don’t want unseeded randomness in my tests, ever.
Seed the tests, and making these pass would be trivial.
The right tool for the right job ¯\(ツ)/¯
The right tool here is tests at a level higher than machine code instructions that have been in CPUs since the 70s. Maybe TDD practice is not to test at this level, but every example of TDD sure tends to be something similar!