• Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    No, there’s a lot of us that don’t want to surrender the incumbent advantage for the very common backlash-against-the-last-party phenomenon we’ve seen many times in the past decades.

    We’re just not as loud as everyone else, and our position makes terrible clickbait.

    • WraithGear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t know, did you see the same debate i saw? But it’s ok, it will be fine. Kamala Harris will just take over when the time comes.

      • Carrolade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        I did. I saw a tired old man and a used car salesman. More importantly though, is I don’t think almost everyone gives two shits about debates or polls. They know these two guys, know them well. What they offer is clear.

        Additionally, I don’t think a President has to be spry. They just need to be good at delegation, that is by far the most important skill. If you think about monarchy, the king did not need to run everything. Simply assign the tasks to people who did know all the details. Generals run the army. Finance ministers run economy. Diplomats run diplomacy. Etc.