• minoscopede@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    “Asked about the overturning of Roe v. Wade, they explained that men cannot get abortions, so it’s only fair that women shouldn’t be able to either, and therefore the court is the epitome of equality”

    Choked on my drink

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      4 months ago

      A fine take on this classic:

      The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.

      Anatole France

      • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        4 months ago

        During the gay marriage debate in Canada people were actually arguing that marriage equality already exists, since everyone gay or straight cannot marry people of the same sex, and therefore gay marriage is a special privilege and not equality.

        When someone is motivated enough, they can come up with all manner of reasoning in bad faith and not serving justice in any meaningful way, and when they come up with something like this they do nothing but marvel at their own perceived cleverness.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    Poor Sotomayor.

    She’s the single wise, rational, compassionate justice who not only has to consistently voice and explain the correct rulings that her asshole conservative peers avoid an order to consolidate wealth and power, but she also gets so much collateral shit because she’s lumped in with all those assholes.

      • yemmly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oh, and the use of an old pic that leaves out one of the justices they quote is a clever part of the satire and not just an oversight. Genius!

        • ZeroCool@vger.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          If that’s what I intended to say I would have. But I didn’t. I was simply mocking the utter inanity of your comment. We’re done here.

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      To be fair they’re only one justice off. Jackson hasn’t been on the bench for too long. It’s not like they’ve got Scalia up there.