Before the 1960s, it was really hard to get divorced in America.

Typically, the only way to do it was to convince a judge that your spouse had committed some form of wrongdoing, like adultery, abandonment, or “cruelty” (that is, abuse). This could be difficult: “Even if you could prove you had been hit, that didn’t necessarily mean it rose to the level of cruelty that justified a divorce,” said Marcia Zug, a family law professor at the University of South Carolina.

Then came a revolution: In 1969, then-Gov. Ronald Reagan of California (who was himself divorced) signed the nation’s first no-fault divorce law, allowing people to end their marriages without proving they’d been wronged. The move was a recognition that “people were going to get out of marriages,” Zug said, and gave them a way to do that without resorting to subterfuge. Similar laws soon swept the country, and rates of domestic violence and spousal murder began to drop as people — especially women — gained more freedom to leave dangerous situations.

Today, however, a counter-revolution is brewing: Conservative commentators and lawmakers are calling for an end to no-fault divorce, arguing that it has harmed men and even destroyed the fabric of society. Oklahoma state Sen. Dusty Deevers, for example, introduced a bill in January to ban his state’s version of no-fault divorce. The Texas Republican Party added a call to end the practice to its 2022 platform (the plank is preserved in the 2024 version). Federal lawmakers like Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) and House Speaker Mike Johnson, as well as former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson, have spoken out in favor of tightening divorce laws.

  • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    5 months ago

    If the only families pumping out kids are Christian crackpots, that’s a win for them. They want to out-breed you.

      • morphballganon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 months ago

        usually

        Please cite your source for that. The religious nutters who are adults now were once kids of religious families themselves.

        • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          5 months ago

          Christianity in the U.S. is quickly shrinking and may no longer be the majority religion within just a few decades, research finds

          https://www.cbsnews.com/news/christianity-us-shrinking-pew-research/

          Losing their religion: why US churches are on the decline

          https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jan/22/us-churches-closing-religion-covid-christianity

          In U.S., Decline of Christianity Continues at Rapid Pace

          https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2019/10/17/in-u-s-decline-of-christianity-continues-at-rapid-pace/

          Pick a study we are in a decline for a reason. The craziest ones are the most motivated but they are the few.

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            5 months ago

            The xtian activists definitely are aware of this overall trend (even if many of them will outright lie about it and many of the flock probably still think they are some kind of supermajority even if they have been losing adherents at about 1% every year for year after year) and it’s exactly why they are agitating to fundamentally change this country to a xtian one.

            They want to be able to COMPEL people to join/stay in their little book club. The only difference between xtian radicals and Islamists is where the retconning leaves off is different. Both of them worship the same god of “the” bible - Allah/Yahweh/Jehovah and both of them have the same dim view of unbelievers and women and outsiders, etc…

            • Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              Man - I know most folks feel the best thing to do is get rid of religion all together - but at this stage I’d settle for and support a new, loud, and active Christian sect denouncing xtian radicals and the churches that support them as Satanic corruptions.

              Believe Old Testament and its edicts mean a damn practical thing in today’s world? Satan.

              Insisting on not rendering unto Caesar what is Caesar’s? Satan.

              Treating your fellow humans as lesser for anything whatsoever? Satan.

              Corrupting Bible verses to justify creating suffering and not rendering aid to anyone who needs it? 100% Satan.

              Forcing means to reduce anyone’s capacity to exercise free will, the one key thing their creator deity granted all humans? Sounds like Satan to me.

              And so on. I realize this is deeply naive. But part of the reason I like The Louvin Brother’s song Satan is Real is whenever I hear the guy’s testimony on Satan, I think about about people in the offending churches:

              I grew selfish, and un-neighbourly
              My friends turned against me
              And finally, my home was broken apart

              The Louvin Brothers themselves would likely vehemently disagree, but - does this sound like anyone you know?

              /end of vaguely spiritualist rant.

              • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Personally I think it says everything that the Abrahamic version of the Theft of Fire leads to the idea that we should hate and denounce the thief rather than see him as responsible for us being raised above essentially being animals. The serpent in the Garden of Eden is analogous to Prometheus, Mātariśvan, Amirani, Pkharmat, Grandmother Spider, etc.

                I also find it interesting that the Theft of Fire is a nearly universal myth (as close as anything gets) - a divine or semi-divine being (often but not always a trickster-type) taking a symbol (often a fire, in the Torah a fruit) representing knowledge against the will of those in power and giving it to man, thus leading to the ability of man to be free to create civilization.

                • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Yeah, while I get the general idea of “beware of the hubris brought about by technology”, but the message from the bible way oversteers into general ignorance and so on. There is a real anti-Promethean streak within this country anyway, and I attribute a lot of that to xtians.

              • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                I’d be all for trying to up our game in the instruction of critical thinking and spotting logical fallacies. I think if religion were to be removed, it might just be supplanted by something just as stupid (for example: the antivax/“stop the steal”/antimask/qanon/pizzagate memeplex) instead of being supplanted by reason.

            • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Both of them worship the same god of “the” bible - Allah/Yahweh/Jehovah and both of them have the same dim view of unbelievers and women and outsiders, etc…

              I agree, all religion is backwards. There’s always a group they don’t like. It just changes depending on your “God’s” region of authority.

            • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yahweh/Jehovah

              I still love that both of these are renderings of the same four letter word, יהוה, or yodh-he-vav-he. Because written Hebrew has a 22 letter alphabet but doesn’t have vowels (but does include a silent letter for when you stick two distinctly separate vowel sounds together - think the two Os in cooperate).

            • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Small group grabbed a huge piece. They didn’t do that quietly. People stopped caring, became more self centered, and we lost sight of communities. We allowed this shit and we need to start voting like it.

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        Slight non sequitur, but slightly connected (welcome to my brain). Anyone can safely ignore this long, rambling comment.

        There’s a series of books called The Laundry Files by Charles Stross. It starts off as kind of an HP Lovecraft meets spy novel meets a sys admin workplace humor thing. Somewhere in there, I think it’s the 4th book, there’s one called The Apocalypse Codex that deals with a quiverful group of Christian true believers that are accidentally worshipping an otherworldly horror and using parasites to “save” folks. It even features a forced birth center. I’ve known quiverfull, prosperity gospel, literalist folks my entire life, but every time I hear about quiverfull people I still think about that novel. I can highly recommend the series if anything I wrote above sounds remotely interesting, especially if you can get the audiobooks. Here’s one of my favorite passages from that book:

        “They’re believers, Mr. Howard. Pentecostalist dispensationalists—they are saved, but they are surrounded by the unsaved, and they think their master is returning imminently, and anyone who isn’t saved by the time of his arrival is doomed. So they intend to save everyone whether or not they want to be saved, one brain parasite at a time.”

        Other than the extra-dimensional horror, I think the book pretty accurately describes the mindset of those people. The series metaphor for modern society is so good that he had to delay and rewrite the last book because the original plan, prior to the pandemic, was to have the final resolution be a highly contagious disease.

      • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah we had a big quiverfull church not far from where I used to live. They were in a cycle of being in the news every few years for how they promote their flock to get on government assistance to afford more kids. People making six figure incomes were getting a variety of benefits because they had over a dozen kids, in two cases two dozen kids. This would piss people, garner calls for legal changes to stop this abuse, bring up how they are exactly the type of people who want to scare people with “welfare queen” stories, etc.

        For a couple generations, the pumping out children mandate made it grow. However, around the third generation they started seeing a steep decline in parishionership. Basically the founding members’ kids weren’t nearly as willing to stay in this cult, and by their grand children’s generation, their birthrate wasn’t enough to replace their flock. By the time their great grand kids’ generation came around (current time) they were quickly dwindling in numbers. Now every time their welfare stuff hits the news they now have interviews with people who cut their families off, and left the cult, being interviewed about how insane they are.

        From what I have been able to find, this seems to be the general timeline of these “super family” sects. They burn themselves out, and as time time progresses, the burnout comes more, and more, quickly. So the long term prospects of the baby factory faiths isn’t good.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          I sure am feeling like a rambling old man today.

          By the time the oldest kids become parents they’re already tired of being parents because mom and dad can’t possibly keep up with a dozen kids and sure aren’t paying nannies and babysitters.

          By the time a couple generations go by, there’s no more help. They still get government assistance if they don’t get out but grandma and great-grandma still have school aged kids and aren’t helping (let’s face it, pappy ain’t doing it).

          So who the fuck is taking care of these hundred and change kids? It’s only good for a surge unless you have multiple wives (again, you know the guys aren’t doing it), which is not happening at a rate that makes a difference, although that happens a little bit. So by that third generation you’ve got a fuck-ton of kids who definitely think it’s bullshit.

          I grew up in a semi-related cult and saw that happen in real time. The one I grew up in wasn’t the “super family” welfare abuse type but did preach to have as many as you could handle while still being able to afford them. I personally know the people you’re talking about and they’re super literalists, young earth creationists, and dispensationalists who hand wave millennialism with “a day is as a thousand years and a thousand years is as a day”. Some of them believe that the war in heaven started the day the Jewish people went back to Israel and that the horsemen of the apocalypse are already here. Some referred to covid as either Plague or Death until they decided it was fake. They’re sure that every event is the harbinger of the rapture.

          Hearing these people talk is fucking wild. I know they’re a minority, but if you go into some of the more insular rural communities you’ll meet them and they are fucking serious. They don’t understand why you and all of their kids can’t just see what’s happening.

          • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I lived an hour away from a “church” that did shit like snake handling. They did not talk about their sect to strangers and were generally very wary of anyone not in their cult. Very strange people. Sorry you had to live through that.

            • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              I guess they talked to us because we were the “light” version of their church. I don’t really know how they’d treat a real outsider I guess. They always tried getting us to come to church stuff with them.

              It was normal to me. My parents weren’t bad people and they didn’t make me raise my younger siblings. I didn’t get abused like a lot of the kids around me. I put up with some bullshit, but we all do to some extent.

              I appreciate it, though.

              • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Yeah lived in Appalachia, if you drove 1 or so hours out of the city, into the mountains you could find some wild shit.

      • freebee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        but no financial state benefits at all for said kids, probably, if it depends on those same conservatives that are anti-divorce.

    • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      They’re saying that about every religion. I guess the Muslims are also having a bunch of kids. Idk, I think a war fought with removed is a war in which everyone loses.