• Maiq@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Alright you primitive screw heads, listen up! You see this? This, is my boomstick! The twelve-gauge double-barreled Remington. S-Mart’s top of the line. You can find this in the sporting goods department. That’s right, this sweet baby was made in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Retails for about a hundred and nine, ninety five. It’s got a walnut stock, cobalt blue steel, and a hair trigger. That’s right, shop smart shop, S-Mart. You got that?

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Introducing firearms even sooner in history… What could go wrong. Surely won’t change the course of history or anything. ☺️

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Being a gun nut, I’ve thought on this. Take something simple like an AR-15 back. They wouldn’t have had the metallurgy 150 years back to duplicate it. Not the barrel or bolt anyway. Springs? Certainly not the propellant. What about the precision needed for the shells alone? And forget rifling a barrel!

        I’ve got a couple of 130-yo, double-barrelled shotguns. One is Damascus steel, the other is Belgian laminated steel. Sounds fancy, may rapidly disassemble with modern shot.

        Bet the mechanisms and overall design would be a mind blower! Mankind, being mankind, would certainly figure a way to get some kinda better killing machine out of the deal.

        LOL, this would have been a solid /r/AskHistorians question!