Summary
First, it acted with startling speed—so quickly, in fact, that it published the order before Alito could finish writing his dissent; he was forced to note only that a “statement” would “follow.”
Relatedly, awkward phrasing in court’s order may imply that Alito—who first received the plaintiffs’ request—failed to refer it to the full court, as is custom, compelling the other justices to rip the case away from him.
Second, it is plain as day that the Supreme Court simply did not trust the Trump administration’s claims that it would not deport migrants over the weekend without due process.
Finally, and perhaps most obviously, it’s critical that only Thomas and Alito noted their dissents. When the court takes emergency action, justices don’t have to note their votes, but they usually do; we can probably assume that this order was 7–2. That would mean that Chief Justice John Roberts—along Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—joined this rebuke to the Trump administration.
When do we drag em from they’re billionaire-paid-for homes and show them democracy
Literally what the rest of the world has been waiting for you to do for nearly a decade. We’re not holding our breath.
Y’know. We are trying. Millions of us. I don’t think I have ever blamed an entire people for the actions of one of their criminals.
Sounds like something trump would do.
Trying how? Like… doing the same thing people did during the Bush era? Making cute signs and doing parades?
Really? Say what you want. Tell everyone in plain words, no hemming and hawing. What do you want? You want a mob if millions running around the United states are just hurting people.?
Say it. You won’t. You are being insulting, small and trying to make yourself look like a tough guy. You wouldn’t have the courage to stand in front of a u. S cop, much less do what your suggesting , tough guy
Let me tell you something you won’t believe , but I KNOW.
He will be jailed. It will happen.
Now you can either say what you mean using all the words you’re thinly veiling, or have the courage of your convictions.
Me? I’ll go back to protecting my family.
Democrats will never allow a president to face consequences for their crimes. I doubt Trump will ever spend a day behind bars.
I hope they prove me wrong!
Please!!! Prove this fellow wrong!
(Canadian hands clasped tightly)
I’m with you, buddy
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
But…French-style, right?
France might be the most democratic place on Earth right now. When the government does something unpopular, buckle the fuck up.
Let’s say “French inspired”. I’m sure we’re creative enough to come up with something fun and unique. I’d argue using guns is the defacto American style, albeit not as much flare as a public guillotining.
Lynching is pretty standard fare for mob justice in the US. It even happened to white people.
“The Tuskegee Institute has recorded the lynchings of 3,446 Blacks and the lynchings of 1,297 Whites, all of which occurred between 1882 and 1968, with the peak occurring in the 1890s”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching_in_the_United_States#Other_ethnicities
A lynching is visually terrifying, sends a strong message, and gets the job done. That could be our thing.
There were some Nazis that gathered downtown in my city the other day, and they could have been a great choice for alpha testing.
It’s out of alpha. We are at least at 0.8.4
0.88.14
I think your link may not be correct
Thanks! I hate Firefox on mobile at times. I fixed it.
The Italians can also act as inspiration regarding how to treat fascists…
The sooner the better